[davidosborne]

I will save that answer for another thread or we can take it offline on the grounds that I would be accused of changing of the topic of the thread... my only point was to suggest that the article ASSUMES that earth did in fact EXIST 40,000 years ago.... something that IMHO is NOT a fact -— bur rather a fantasy -— again IMHO

[RockyMtnMan]

Your statement does not register as sane for about 99.9% of the posters on this thread. So given that you are not on the same plane of reason, should you be commenting on a discovery that actually means something to the rest of us?

To us it is a FACT the earth is far older than 6000yrs and no matter what you say that FACT will not change. No offense but these are the FACTs my FRiend.

[Coyoteman]

my only point was to suggest that the article ASSUMES that earth did in fact EXIST 40,000 years ago.... something that IMHO is NOT a fact -— bur rather a fantasy -— again IMHO

You have the entire Religion Forum to witness in. Why are you so rude, intruding in a science thread with your own narrow interpretation of one religion? That is about as polite as someone wandering into a church and yelling B...S...