Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/06/2008 9:30:09 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The_Republican

The truth is that Obama got the nomination by some lucky votes in a few caucus states, Clinton is the much stronger fall candidate.

The Democrats are simply terrified of taking the nomination from an African-American. They fear riots in the streets and at their convention.


2 posted on 06/06/2008 9:33:48 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

Interesting article, but it doesn’t (and really can’t) take into account the ‘rage’ factor if the nomination is ‘stolen’ from Obama and given to Hillary. That is very hard to measure, but it isn’t hard to envision the myriad of ways it could alter the vote.


3 posted on 06/06/2008 9:35:17 AM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

The dems rather consult astrologists than astrophysicists...LOL


4 posted on 06/06/2008 9:36:37 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
the median result of all the polls conducted in the weeks prior to an election is an especially effective predictor of which candidate will win that election

But we are not within weeks of the fall election.

Later in the article Tyson admits that this method doesn't predict November.

5 posted on 06/06/2008 9:38:42 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Political predictions made today.


6 posted on 06/06/2008 9:52:24 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

So if the election is limited to only 19 of the 57 states, Hillary could beat McCain?


11 posted on 06/06/2008 10:24:52 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican

Of all the states to miss, they missed Hawaii???


16 posted on 06/06/2008 11:37:52 AM PDT by Round 9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
when Professor Gott and Dr. Colley applied the median method in 2004, they correctly predicted the winner in 49 states, missing only Hawaii.

If I were them, I'd be seriously concerned by this. A senile chihuahua could have predicted that Kerry would easily win Hawaii. It's very odd that their model messed up there.

25 posted on 06/06/2008 2:33:37 PM PDT by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment: It's not about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson