Posted on 06/06/2008 4:05:07 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
News that the most iconic item of male dress, the necktie, is in danger of falling out of fashion in America is a grim intimation of the decline of yet another civilisation. The tie is a weathervane of the health of a society; if you doubt that look at Iran. The tie is the emblem of western civilisation, said to be descended from the focalia worn by Roman orators to protect their vocal chords.
A well-tied tie is the first serious step in life, declared Oscar Wilde. He was right and the rules of neckwear are rigid. Vulgar innovators may have experimented with a variety of expanding and contracting versions, from kipper to boot-lace, but the classic width remains three and a quarter inches at base, the patterns restricted to small white polka dots on a blue or wine background, Paisley whorls, lozenge shapes, or self-coloured. Silk is the only approved fabric.
David Cameron should hold fast to his neckwear
Although the 32 varieties of knot prevailing in the 19th century have been reduced to three basics, only one is acceptable to the purist. Britains imperial decline can be traced to the invention of the Windsor Knot by the Prince of Wales, later Edward VIII. This modish outrage clearly signalled his unsuitability to reign: Mrs Simpson had nothing to do with the case this knot signalled to all right-thinking chaps that the fellow had to go.
The Half-Windsor, an anaemic version of this aberration, is similarly to be abominated. The only unchallengeably respectable tie knot is the classic Four-in-Hand, which heightens the knot to elegant proportions and speaks of good taste. The sporadic abandonment of the tie by Dave Cameron and his populist cohorts is to be deplored. Did Dizzy wander around in an open-necked shirt? Churchill sported a bow-tie, but as it was teamed with a wing-collar, descendant of the Brummell starched cravat, it was perfectly acceptable. The tie is to be defended at all costs.
Nonsense and hooey.
The modern necktie is descended from the neckscarves worn by Croatian mercenaries during the 30 Years War, 1630s. Hence the original name, cravat.
The tie is the emblem of western civilisation,
Hate’em,
Hate’em,
Hate’em!!
The article sounds a little, well, foppish. But then, didn’t the author quote Oscar Wilde???
Hard to argue with that.
Actually Cravat is the anglicization of the German word Krawatte (cra-vah-teh).
Cravat probably got to English via German and French. I’m not sure why that invalidates the original derivation from Croat.
I’ve had to wear ties before. Professional appearance and all that nonsense.
Nasty things ties are, they give anyone who wants to do you harm a ready handle with which to throttle you.
The velcro breakaway tie is the exception, it’s the only kind I wear these days and very rarely at that.
Windsor Knot
yitbos
I wore ties on occasions and for some jobs through most of my life. Although not commanded against wearing ties (being a Gentile), I avoid them now while continuing to try to be neat for work in other ways (slacks, button-down shirts, at least mid-length sleeves, etc.).
Outlandish pattern, sometimes; techie ASCII pattern, sometimes; never plain.
My favorite is a hand-painted silk one. Abstract, vaguely floral pattern, goes well with a gaudy Hawaiian shirt (don't ask).
I never wear a business suit, so the tie is always a "topper" to a sport shirt, not hidden away behind a jacket.
I rarely wear one, but I'd hate to lose the opportunity or ability. It's a part of the repertoire.
The tie sucks.
I can’t really think of any circumstances were it could not be countered, or if it couldn’t, it wouldn’t matter, because the person in question is going to kill you any way because he is too good for you.
Frankly, I wish the open collar was back in fasion. And hats. I sorely wish hats were back in fashion, other than baseball caps, which you only really wear if you’re either a teenager, an oaf, or a pevert going into a sex shop and trying to look inconspicious....
One's favorite caliber on a bolo tie simply screams class. IMHO.
Or lacking in hair and need to protect your head from the sun while doing yard work, golfing, at the park with the kids, etc...
Bolo screams 12 pack of Bud and an Earnest movie.
I must say, dh looks very sharp in a tie, and has recently been given several to wear on days when he sees clients, along with a request NEVER to wear the rugby shirt my mother gave him to work, as he resembles a giant bumblebee in it.
I’m wondering if there is any point to buying a $300 tie, as opposed to a $20 tie (or one marked down to that.) Do they hang better? Do they advertise status, with men checking them out the women check out each other’s shoes?
Do they boast about their bargains? (”Hermes, and it was 60% off at Barneys!”)
Some men look absolutely strangled in ties, and they still have to wear them sometimes, poor things.
It's a surprisingly effective strategy.
Nah. The modern necktie was invented by early feminists, to get revenge on the guys who invented the corset.
I always thought it was a symbol of a man’s ......you know..but the practical aspect of it is you can own only one lousy suit and thirty five ties, right, and go for a whole month and a week with a different look each day. Just like I would wear a different pin or scarf......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.