Cities for Living

City Journal ^ | Spring 2008 | Roger Scruton

[Lorianne]

American visitors to Paris, Rome, Prague, or Barcelona, comparing what they see with what is familiar from their own continent, will recognize how careless their countrymen often have been in their attempts to create cities. But the American who leaves the routes prescribed by the Ministries of Tourism will quickly see that Paris is miraculous in no small measure because modern architects have not been able to get their hands on it. Elsewhere, European cities are going the way of cities in America: high-rise offices in the center, surrounded first by a ring of lawless dereliction, and then by the suburbs, to which those who work in the city flee at the end of the day. Admittedly, nothing in Europe compares with the vandalism that modernists have wreaked on Buffalo, Tampa, or Minneapolis (to take three examples of American cities that cause me particular pain). Nevertheless, the same moral disaster is beginning to afflict us—the disaster of cities in which no one wishes to live, where public spaces are vandalized and private spaces boarded up.

[ken21]

interesting read.

the dichotomy between modernism and traditionalism is drawn a bit too extreme.

i’m not a hater of modernism per se.

prince charles’ stuff is boring.

[LibFreeOrDie]

More about Poundbury:

http://www.poundbury.info/

[devere]

Mr. Krier sounds like a true disciple of the late Jane Jacobs, whose great book, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities”, revolutionized the field of urban planning.