Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shrinkermd
Many foreign courts have respectfully considered the American approach — and then rejected it.

What frightens me about this case can be summed up with the following key words; Kelo SCOTUS 2005, 2nd Amendment restrictions, Roe v Wade SCOTUS 1973, Fairness Doctrine and Same-Sex Marriage. Each of the above derives from judicial or regulatory cases and takes something that had previously been considered clear law and brought it into dispute.

I believe that we are only 3 SCOTUS appointees (Obama?) away from having a "Living Constitution" that would take into account 'political realities' and foreign jurisprudence on some equal basis with our Constitution. Either the Constitution is the ABSOLUTE LAST WORD LAW OF THE LAND changeable only by the Amendment process OR it is paper to be interpreted in the ever changing winds of fashion.

This November, vote like your freedom is at stake because it really is!

14 posted on 06/11/2008 7:33:24 PM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

You take away any aspect of free speech in the United States and very slowly small concerned groups of citizens will organize. Their activity and numbers will grow and it will not be pretty. It will happen.


26 posted on 06/13/2008 1:02:54 AM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson