Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
"Universal background checks don't affect the right of self-defense in the home.

Lie. Tell that to the woman who was delayed, and was murdered during the delay.

Banning a super dangerous class of weapons, like assault weapons, also would not adversely affect the right of self-defense in the home," said Brady Campaign Attorney Dennis Henigan.

Lie. Anyone who is made a criminal because of possession of a certain gun has had his rights affected. And by the way, the right to self-defense extends beyond the home. Oddly, when the JBTs go through people's home on a no-knock, what do they choose to use for maximum protection of themselves? Sawed off, fully automatic, high-capacity assault rifles. If it's good enough for our "protectors" it's good enough for us.

"Curbing large volume sales doesn't affect self-defense in the home."

Depending on what a "large volume sale" is, this too might be a lie. 2?

It's the same old same old from the gun grabbers. "Oh, we're not trying to restrict any rights, just enact some reasonable, modest, gun safety measures." Liars all.

14 posted on 06/15/2008 5:31:14 AM PDT by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
It's the same old same old from the gun grabbers. "Oh, we're not trying to restrict any rights, just enact some reasonable, modest, gun safety measures." Liars all.

My thoughts too.

23 posted on 06/15/2008 11:21:34 AM PDT by lowbridge ("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson