Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

There’s a reason why the US Military went with a gas turbine setup for the Abrams instead of a traditional diesel like it’s counterparts.


9 posted on 06/16/2008 10:14:21 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miliantnutcase
"There’s a reason why the US Military went with a gas turbine setup for the Abrams instead of a traditional diesel like it’s counterparts."

Sure, where else could you get 10,000 hp in a size to power the tank. Unfortunately, it gets horrible fuel economy.

46 posted on 06/16/2008 10:59:34 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: miliantnutcase

It wasn’t for gas mileage.


52 posted on 06/16/2008 11:17:49 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: miliantnutcase
There’s a reason why the US Military went with a gas turbine setup for the Abrams instead of a traditional diesel like it’s counterparts.

Yeah, and the reason is not fuel efficiency. The Abrams is a monster gas guzzler.

57 posted on 06/16/2008 11:38:19 AM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson