Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WhiteHouse.com Larry Sinclair Polygraph Press Conference at National Press Club June 18 at 4:00 PM
Whitehouse.com ^ | 6/16/08 | staff

Posted on 06/16/2008 8:22:23 PM PDT by pissant

WASHINGTON, June 17, 2008: Whitehouse.com will hold a press conference regarding the Larry Sinclair controversy on June 18, 2008 in the Visagor Lounge of the National Press Club, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045. Signup will start at 3:00 PM, and the actual conference will start at approximately 4:00 PM, following the conclusion of Mr. Sinclair's press conference, which is scheduled earlier in the day.

At the press conference, Whitehouse.com will describe how, in February 2008, Mr. Sinclair accepted an offer from Whitehouse.com to take two professionally-administered polygraph examinations to test the veracity of his explosive allegations. After the initial polygraph expert examined the results and made his conclusions, Whitehouse.com was accused of taking a $750,000 bribe to suppress and or alter the results of the polygraph examinations.

During the press conference, Whitehouse.com will release the results of the polygraph examinations, the reports of the experts, and a video of Mr. Sinclair taken while the examinations were being administered.

Whitehouse.com focuses on giving average Americans a greater voice on issues facing the country. Whitehouse.com, which is celebrating its 11th year, has been visited by over 100 million people since its inception in 1997. We are not affiliated with or endorsed by U.S. Government.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 14minutes59seconds; donaldyoung; larrysinclair; larrysinclairslover; obama; pornsite; sinclair; whokilleddonaldyoung; young
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last
Suddenly the boys from Whitehouse.com have jumped back into the Larry Sinclair fray. What impeccable timing
1 posted on 06/16/2008 8:27:32 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Soliton; mondoreb

Your boys have decided to play after all....


2 posted on 06/16/2008 8:28:21 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Who owns and runs Whitehouse.com?


3 posted on 06/16/2008 8:37:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I thought I heard that whitehouse.com was a porn site. How did they get involved in this affair?


4 posted on 06/16/2008 8:39:29 PM PDT by Taffini (Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

A guy named Parisi, and Obama hack. he sandbagged Larry Sinclair on the lie detector test, then would not release the results or video as he said he would, then he removed all posts about the whole saga from his website.

Now Larry Sinclair has a press conference the wednesday, and the worm came crawling back out of his hole to trumpet the polygraph.

This is getting gooooooood


5 posted on 06/16/2008 8:40:03 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Taffini

They were a porno site until recently. They are the ones who set Larry Sinclair up for the ‘failed’ polygraph test. They are dem activists.


6 posted on 06/16/2008 8:41:14 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I suppose if Obama turns out to be a switch hitting, cheating, drug using, former and/or current Muslim, America hating candidate then the media will just have to find new reasons to ignore it.


7 posted on 06/16/2008 8:43:12 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

The dems have lined up this whitehouse.com press conference to follow Larry’s press conference on Wednesday at the National Press Club. The phones must have been blazing between the DNC, Whitehouse.com, and the KosKids to get this rapid fire response press conference arranged so quickly.


8 posted on 06/16/2008 8:45:37 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BossLady; Lancey Howard; Dajjal

Latest developments PING


9 posted on 06/16/2008 8:46:23 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Did a little digging.

I knew that Whithouse.com was once a porn site that people have mistaken for WhiteHouse.gov. Daniel Parisi appears to have morphed his website into politics. Parsi has owned the domain name Whithouse.com since 1997, which makes him a suspicious character.

10 posted on 06/16/2008 8:48:49 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Gettin’ reeaaal good.


11 posted on 06/16/2008 8:51:09 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Additionally suspicious since he sandbagged Larry Sinclair. Why would he go through all that expense and trouble? Wednesday is going to be one very interesting day at the ole NPC.

Get yer popcorn ready.


12 posted on 06/16/2008 8:52:02 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: txflake

With the press treating Rev Jeremiah and Bill Ayers and Rezko as yesterday’s news, they may finally be forced to cover LarryGate.


13 posted on 06/16/2008 8:53:52 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

They should have released the tape long ago.


14 posted on 06/16/2008 8:54:31 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taffini

Not porn any more. Now some fly by night news site.


15 posted on 06/16/2008 8:55:58 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

It will be much more effective for them to follow Larry’s presser and control the message instead of releasing on the website like they said they would and have it dissected by the blogosphere.


16 posted on 06/16/2008 8:56:14 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Daniel Parisi must take a polygraph. The guy could be lying.


17 posted on 06/16/2008 8:56:43 PM PDT by Stentor (Obama supporters. Letting the little void do the thinking for the big void.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant; usmcobra

NPC can’t cancel now. It’s on.


18 posted on 06/16/2008 8:56:50 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

We already know he is a dirtball and an Obama shill


19 posted on 06/16/2008 8:58:21 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

obumpa


20 posted on 06/16/2008 8:59:47 PM PDT by Dajjal (Who murdered Larry Bland, Nate Spencer & Donald Young?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake

I guess the KosKid’s campaign to get Larry’s gig at the NPC was wasted effort. They should have coordinated more closely with Obama’s campaign who surely have a hand in WH.com’s sudden press conference.


21 posted on 06/16/2008 9:00:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Sounds like somebody gave Whorehouse.com another check.
Larry, I'm sure, will be quite prepared to answer.

Whew..... The popcorn concession should make a fortune.


22 posted on 06/16/2008 9:02:29 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
"...After the initial polygraph expert examined the results and made his conclusions, Whitehouse.com was accused of taking a $750,000 bribe to suppress and or alter the results of the polygraph examinations..."

Why not at least deny taking the bribe if you were accused of it? I don't get that. They admit they were accused of taking a bribe in this statement, yet say nothing about whether or not that happened. A simple denial of accepting the rumored bribe would seem natural if you're going to admit that you were accused of taking a bribe. wth?

23 posted on 06/16/2008 9:02:38 PM PDT by smedley64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

There are people who still insist on putting eggs in this basket? This Sinclair guy’s credibility (among the approximately .0001% of the population who even know who he is) has got to be pushing negative numbers by now.


24 posted on 06/16/2008 9:05:03 PM PDT by dbwz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Whitehouse is taking the room Larry left (cap. 40).

Larry re-booked the Holeman room (cap 110).


25 posted on 06/16/2008 9:05:23 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smedley64

It’s the same languange they used on their initial non denial denial back in Feb., before they decided to wahs their hands of the entire Larry Sinclair saga. Lo and behold, they are back just in time to follow Larry’s own press conference.

So I ask, why would a newly minted hard news site (formerly a porn site, granted) have so much interest in Larry Sinclair. And why would they spend who knows how many thousands to pull together a last minute presser?


26 posted on 06/16/2008 9:06:41 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Gore endorsing Obambi? Boring. McCain at La Raza, uhhhg.

Sinclair versus Obama, that’s entertainment!!


27 posted on 06/16/2008 9:08:23 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Also Michelle will be on The View Wednesday, save the hour.

http://www.popcrunch.com/michelle-obama-the-view-june-18th/


28 posted on 06/16/2008 9:08:39 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Im not up on this stuff ...is the polygraph postive or negative?


29 posted on 06/16/2008 9:08:39 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aria
"I suppose if Obama turns out to be a switch hitting, cheating, drug using, former and/or current Muslim, America hating candidate then the media will just have to find new reasons to ignore it."

Although I believe it is a mistake for us to put any eggs into Sinclair's basket, wouldn't all of the attributes you cite be considered resume enhancers by Obama's handlers, as well as many of his supporters?
30 posted on 06/16/2008 9:17:35 PM PDT by EasySt (The Republican is a Democrat, the Democrat is a crooked Socialist, and the Socialist is a Communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: txflake; George Maschke

As they say in the bidness, any news is good news for someone trying to get name recognition. WH.com will offer up snippets of the polygraph video, along with the doddering old fraud who administered the tests and tell us he was lying. I suggest Sinclair consult with our own George W. Maschke, at antipolygraph.org


31 posted on 06/16/2008 9:17:41 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Why do these gals go on the view? they must pay well.


32 posted on 06/16/2008 9:19:49 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: woofie

whitehouse.com said he failed it.


33 posted on 06/16/2008 9:19:58 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Negative, supposedly. these guys sandbagged a very naive Mr. Sinclair. they are attempting to shoot down his story with their presser that will now follow Larry’s.


34 posted on 06/16/2008 9:21:35 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dbwz

alot more are going to know about him come wednesday. It is a death match - Sinclair versus Obama and the DNC.


35 posted on 06/16/2008 9:22:52 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pissant

So you think all the ins and outs (joke) of the story will be on the table tommorrow?


36 posted on 06/16/2008 9:23:28 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Wednesday


37 posted on 06/16/2008 9:24:54 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I just want to congratulate the Dems on their ‘06 House and Senate re-capture using Mark Foley to do so; I sense now they are feeling some empathy.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.


38 posted on 06/16/2008 9:25:25 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Don't know, guess everybody will just have to show up at the 'Holeman Room' and find out. Heh.
39 posted on 06/16/2008 9:28:08 PM PDT by mkjessup (Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is CSPAN going to cover this or the other presser?


40 posted on 06/16/2008 9:30:30 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: txflake

They aren’t planning on dying by this sword. The entire DNC/Obama/Kos/Moveon/DUmmie apparatus is going after Larry. It truly is one man against the world (the left wing of the world anyway)


41 posted on 06/16/2008 9:31:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

I seriously doubt it. They may cover the Whitehouse.com event, but certainly not Larry’s. The libs run the joint.


42 posted on 06/16/2008 9:32:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, two, if you count Deborah Jean Palfrey’s attorney, who also represents Sinclair.


43 posted on 06/16/2008 9:37:46 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Yes. And there are some pretty decent bloggers in Larry’s corner. Not many, but a few.


44 posted on 06/16/2008 9:39:39 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I was kind of hoping they would, I need a good laugh. ;)


45 posted on 06/16/2008 9:39:58 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

I heard it may be streamed. We shall see. It is funny no matter how you slice it. But one man’s allegations is turning the Obamunists’ world upside down right now. Gotta love it.


46 posted on 06/16/2008 9:44:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Between whitehouse.com and firedoglake......Larry is getting loads of free publicity!!! I predict he will need an even bigger room!!! :o


47 posted on 06/16/2008 10:05:38 PM PDT by BossLady ("People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own soul" - Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BossLady

Go Larry Go. Can you imagine the frantic calls in the Obama camp to get WH.com to do a presser on such short notice?


48 posted on 06/16/2008 10:09:10 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I love to see these tards spinning their wheels and using their energy on this thing. And don't you find it curious that Michelle is doing The View on Wed?

If there was no truth to what Larry is saying....then why place any energy against it at all???

49 posted on 06/16/2008 10:14:26 PM PDT by BossLady ("People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own soul" - Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Imagine 2100+ Obama delegates and Superdelegates panicking over this. Imagine the MSM writing up Michelle’s View appearance, while distracted by what’s about to happen at NPC.

Chaos :)


50 posted on 06/16/2008 10:19:06 PM PDT by txhurl (Payback for Mark Foley in spades. And Crackers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson