[JLLH]

I haven’t given it a lot of thought, but some clear transition where the two species are clearly transforming from one into another... but the only pictures I’ve seen show separate skulls which theorists cannot even clearly agree as to the species - let alone the relationship between them. (Hope I’m making myself understood and that my answer hasn’t muddied the water.)

[allmendream]

They cannot agree as to the exact relationship of every fossil, or if they were in the direct line that led to humanity or an offshoot that died out, and until DNA can settle the matter they can argue the various points of cranial or anatomic morphology. But they all agree that these many species of austrolopithocine and Neanderthal and such were all, root or branch, somewhere in the line of descent that led to humanity.

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

I think I understand, but I still invite you to think about what exactly would constitute “some clear transition where the two species are clearly transforming from one into another.” Evolutionists would say that a bunch of skulls that we have a hard time saying were definitely ape or definitely human would be exactly what we would expect if apes and humans had a common ancestor. If you disagree, what else should we look for?