Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to urge lifting of ban on offshore drilling
Reuters ^

Posted on 06/17/2008 5:11:01 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Bush to urge lifting of ban on offshore drilling Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:55pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush will make an announcement on Wednesday about energy and call on Congress to pass legislation lifting a ban on offshore oil drilling, the White House said.

"With gasoline now over $4 a gallon, tomorrow he will explicitly call on Congress to also pass legislation lifting the congressional ban on safe, environmentally friendly offshore oil drilling," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said on Tuesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; bush; coastalenvironment; congress; energy; environment; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: digger48

You got that right. Where was George when we really him on this issue?


41 posted on 06/17/2008 6:44:11 PM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Bush’s drilling deal shields Glades, gulf

WASHINGTON — Defusing two longstanding environmental disputes, President Bush and Gov. Jeb Bush announced deals Wednesday that could prevent drilling for natural gas off Florida’s gulf coast and block the expansion of oil wells in a federal preserve beside the Everglades.

The federal government will pay Chevron and two other companies $115-million for oil and gas leases in an area of the Gulf of Mexico known as Destin Dome, about 25 miles off the beaches of Pensacola.

Separately, the government plans to pay $120-million in cash or credits to the Collier family, one of South Florida’s largest land developers, to stop drilling for oil in the Big Cypress National Preserve and other areas of South Florida.

The deals won’t end the threat of drilling near Florida’s coast, nor will they stop production in Big Cypress, where pumping could continue for 10 years.

President Bush said the agreements show the federal government is “a strong partner” in protecting the environment. And Gov. Bush, boasting that Florida has some of the world’s best beaches, said: “It just did not seem right that 25 miles off the coast there might be drilling. Today, that possibility doesn’t exist.”

...

ChevronTexaco spokesman Fred Gorell said his company was “very disappointed,” and Conoco spokesman Carlton Adams said, “’When you spend the number of years that we have, and the effort that went into this, and you know there are considerable natural gas reserves there, then there’s a sense of, ‘Gee, I wish we could have.’ “

http://www.sptimes.com/2002/05/30/State/Bush_s_drilling_deal_.shtml


42 posted on 06/17/2008 6:52:31 PM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“Oh well. It will give the Dems a good laugh.”

If the Dems laugh at this while persisting with solving every problem by raising taxes, it will be another reason to dump the Democrat majority in the next election.

About fricking time.


43 posted on 06/17/2008 6:54:36 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Deals to Block Drilling in Everglades, Gulf

Bush Promises $235 Million to Buy Out Mineral Rights in Fla. Areas

President Bush announced two major deals yesterday to protect Florida’s natural treasures from oil and gas drilling, pledging $235 million to buy out mineral rights in the cypress swamps of the Everglades and off the white-sand beaches of the Gulf of Mexico....

The deals to protect some of the last refuges of the endangered Florida panther and Florida’s Gulf Coast could also provide a political boost to his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush (R), who is up for reelection this fall. They may also burnish the president’s environmental credentials in the state that decided the 2000 election.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A30379-2002May29?language=printer


44 posted on 06/17/2008 6:56:41 PM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ktime

That Saint Pete article was accurate at the time it was written. But, Area 181 South was added to Area 181 in 2006.


45 posted on 06/17/2008 6:58:37 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ktime
Bush made three compromises, the two that you have mentioned, and also on the Destin Dome.

This was done because of Florida election 2000 and Jeb Bush's reelection.

46 posted on 06/17/2008 7:04:42 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kempo; Mr_Moonlight; what's up

Bravo to the Republicans for hearing the ‘drill now’ message and responding in unison. Bush has reiterated what he has been for all along. We’ve gotten folks like Crist to flip, and McCain out there for it too.

What we are starting to see is a Republican united front to deal with high energy prices the right way.

The Republicans leaders have gotten the message and are responding. It’s amazing how many freepers jump all over the GOP *even more* when they step up to the plate and do the right thing!


47 posted on 06/17/2008 7:05:38 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ktime

The everglades and offshore are two different things.

Unlike the frozen tundra in ANWR and offshore drilling, there is a delicate habitat in the everglades worth protecting. Not that I am for a ban on drilling, but its a different category from the other cases.


48 posted on 06/17/2008 7:07:34 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ktime

thanks for info, I should amend my prior comment that Bush was always for offshore drilling ... as for the press bias: “The deals won’t end the threat of drilling near Florida’s coast”

What threat? Natural gas drilling is no threat. Has anyone ever seen a natural gas spill? Nothing can be more inconsequential for a beach than a natural gas drilling platform 50 miles offshore. We could have 1,000 of them offshore and nobody would have a hint of a difference.


49 posted on 06/17/2008 7:15:42 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; what's up

It’s kind of sad that you have to cite leftwing sources on how Bush has been friendly to domestic energy.

“The Bush administration on Thursday directed government land managers to remove environmental and procedural obstacles that are slowing development of oil and gas resources in several areas in the West that have high potential for energy production.

They are telling companies “you don’t have to worry about the harm from the project itself,” said Sharon Buccino, a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, a Washington-based environmental organization. “That’s creating a sacrifice zone in acres where they want to go in and get the resource.”

They have a real axe to grind on it, showing all the things he is doing, meanwhile we’ve got people on FR complaining that ‘nothing has been done’. Cant both be truth!


50 posted on 06/17/2008 7:18:45 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I think most people have an outdated view of what modern day drilling is like.

It is not the geysers of oil spouting into the sky. Slant drilling allows you get oil from areas outside of environmentally sensitive areas.

Those who seek to ban drilling are not doing it for realistic valid environmental reasons but because they are anti-capitalistic and do not want to see oil companies (some bizarre Freemason, Bildaberger, Tri-lateral Commission conspiracy beliefs) to be profitable.

Obama and the Democrats including McCain want to add windfall profits tax on oil companies for ‘excessive profits’.

How American is that?

Become successful and get penalized.


51 posted on 06/17/2008 7:19:31 PM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
It’s kind of sad that you have to cite leftwing sources on how Bush has been friendly to domestic energy.

I finally found a good use for moonbats! President Bush campaigned on opening new sources, and I believe, did his best to deliver and it drove the environmentalists nuts.

In this instance, people here on FR really have no excuse in blaming any of this on the President.

52 posted on 06/17/2008 7:24:15 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
What we are starting to see is a Republican united front

The dynamic couldn't have happened without the high oil prices.

That's the only thing that's going to convince the public; Repubs debating on TV over and over with libs on the environment has not and would never achieve it.

53 posted on 06/17/2008 8:46:15 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: what's up

MUST SEE TV! Watch this speech on energy by Michael Williams Republican Texas Railroad Commissioner. He gets it.

http://www.williamsfortexas.com/


54 posted on 06/17/2008 9:50:47 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - co-bloggers wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Yes, he does " GET IT " .... we need more like him.
Michael Williams as VP !!!
55 posted on 06/17/2008 11:18:09 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

WOW he is awesome!!!!


56 posted on 06/18/2008 1:28:45 AM PDT by Katarina (I am the GOP's and McCain's least favorite Voter - I am a Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: digger48

At least he found out that gas was going to hit 4 bucks a gallon.


57 posted on 06/18/2008 5:48:39 PM PDT by kenth (Just think, .000001783% of the population is screwing it all up for the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson