Posted on 06/17/2008 6:00:53 PM PDT by freespirited
Not so. The footprints that get pressed into the birth certificates in the hospital are for identification purposes.
Wherever Obama was born, if in the US anyway, the hospital has a copy of his birth certificate stating the attending physician and address of the mother/parents.
You have to read what he said. he is not saying that it is supposed to be a copy of the original BC. He is saying this document is NOT a genuine, official print out of a computer generated Certificate of Birth. It is one created by a graphics system incompatible with an official computer generated document.
It’s even more interesting that he dissected this thing so completely as a fraud.
Barak:
1024x1000=1,024,000
compressed size: 113118
ratio: 9.05
yours:
1021x851=868,871 pixels
compressed size: 296015
ratio: 2.94
Also, your image has large white areas which are almost infinitely compressable, so the compression ratio of the "interesting" sections is probably closer to 2.7.
Additionally, yours is a black&white image, so no color information has to be saved. Barak's is full color, so three times the data has to be saved.
Go back and compres yours to about 90,000 bytes and then compare the images. That still won't handle the color difference, but it will start showing what you lose in compression.
Another HUGE blunder. In 1961 “African” was not a “race”. His father would have been listed as “black”, possibly “Negro” and maybe even “colored”. The person who reproduces them at request DOES NOT change any data for political correctness as that would be falsifying official government documents.
Our grandson was born in HI. The background paper is the same except sharper and clearer on my grandson’s. The border is much darker on my grandson’s birth certificate. The seal looks somewhat smaller on my grandsons but both are black instead of in color. No we are not going to publish his birth certificate.
That is a great site.
>>>As for the first part, the acronym, “OHSM,” stands for “Office of Health Statistics Management,” which is not the responsible office within the Department of Health for issuing a certificate of birth.
ooops
https://www.ehawaii.gov/doh/vitrec/exe/vitrec.cgi
See BS documents part deaux??
What are the letters in the middle of the document? Very faint and appear backwards.
They do respond with a computer generated document. He is saying that this is a fake computer generated document
[... It’s interesting that the person who wrote this
analysis ignored the reverse datestamp on the document...]
I didn’t think much about it because I thought it was
a water mark.
My sister law was born at St Francis Hospital in Honolulu around the same time . Her birth certificate is hand written with ink . Her assessment is this is strange since most were had written back then on the islands except the base babies.
“Check out ExposeObama.com and look at the ads the “Willie Horton” people are planning to drop on the airwaves after Labor Day.”
Some day we’ll get an American running for the President again.
This document seems to be a correct document, just not what is claimed. See: http://suitablyflip.com/suitably_flip/2008/06/kos-tries-to-pa.html
But there’s a bigger problem here than the document’s chain of custody. It involves the difference between a “Certificate of Live Birth” and a “Certification of Live Birth”. This is the latter, despite Kos’ identification of it as the former.
Per the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (a state agency that happens to detail the difference):
In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.
Indeed, the Kos document offers scant details, limited to name, gender, date, location, and names and races of parents.
Without signatures, stamp and date issued it looks to be something whipped up for public consumption. A fake.
JUN 6 2007. It looks like bleed through from a date stamped on the back.
Thank you OP!
I saw all of this, too, when I downloaded this form and looked at the backgrounds.
Look at the two I’s in Hawaii. Really sloppy.
I do not know if this helps, but I found a marriage certificate of the same Hawaii issue type on another bbs. I downloaded it, but it is too blurry to read. Maybe OP can see what is on it in terms of official seals, form numbers and so on.
http://www.foreigndocuments.com/images/docs/marriage_usa_hawaii_small.jpg
We are looking for your sister-in-law’s birth certificate type. Is it hospital-issued? With baby footprints? Does a doctor sign off on her birth time and health status?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
