Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emerging Threats: India for stricter infiltration sentences (Illegal Aliens)
UPI.com ^ | 17 Jun 08

Posted on 06/18/2008 6:01:42 AM PDT by xzins

NEW DELHI, June 17 (UPI) -- India's Supreme Court has ruled stricter sentences should be imposed on infiltrators from Pakistan and Bangladesh.

"There is need for imposing stricter sentence under the Foreigners Act," the Supreme Court held in its ruling.

A vacation bench consisting of Justices Arijit Pasayat and P.P. Naolekar dismissed an appeal by a Pakistani national, Habib Ibrahim, who illegally entered India to meet his wife and children in Jaipur. He challenged a Rajasthan High Court order, which upheld a five-year imprisonment awarded by the trial court.

"The only plea to justify the appellant's presence was that he had come to visit his wife and children," said Justice Pasayat in his judgment, adding that does not give him any right to stay illegally in India. The appellant had been issued a transit visa, that too for Nepal, for six months. There was no valid document in his possession to stay in India. Therefore, Section 3 read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act has been rightly applied. The conviction cannot be faulted, the court said.

While arrested, Ibrahim was carrying a Pakistani passport and an expired Nepalese visa. A session court in Jaipur sentenced him to five-year imprisonment. The Rajasthan government said he had knowingly stayed in India without a visa, and no leniency should be shown to him.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: borders; illegals; india

1 posted on 06/18/2008 6:01:44 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins

Sounds about right as a way of dealing with the problem. If we did this we wouldn’t have a problem with illegal invaders.


2 posted on 06/18/2008 6:05:35 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Every country in the World that is capable of it controls who comes across their borders. Only the U.S. is considered racist and immoral when it does exactly the same thing.


3 posted on 06/18/2008 6:15:02 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Does Obama know ANYONE who likes America, capitalism, or white people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Precisely.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong, unethical, immoral, etc. about controlling immigration/visitation into one’s own country. There’s everything sane about it.


4 posted on 06/18/2008 6:18:08 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Only msm and libtards consider the US immoral for doing it. That is if they even believe it and aren’t just using it as something to beat on the US about.


5 posted on 06/18/2008 6:19:25 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll

I love the word “Infiltrators,” too. It has a nice ring to it, even better than “illegal aliens,” which has gotten overexposure lately.

From now on, I’m calling them “infiltrators.”


6 posted on 06/18/2008 6:08:34 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (Patriotism to DemocRats is like sunlight to Dracula.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson