Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amelia

Bad sign, but still far too early to can the program. Let vouchers run their course properly (five years should be the minimum), then make a decision about retaining it, refining it or abandoning it.

Whatever happened to a little patience and foresight?


6 posted on 06/18/2008 6:40:44 AM PDT by Reaganomical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganomical

I can’t agree more - the whole concept is to find out where the “good” schools are and allow migration of the school populations to these better schools. The good schools get the funding, and must be allowed to be selective of their students. This is a thing called competition!

The worse schools see the students voting with their feet/vouchers. This doesn’t happen over night!


10 posted on 06/18/2008 6:45:12 AM PDT by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganomical

Five years is a much better time frame.

“Whatever happened to a little patience and foresight?”

Our popular culture promotes INSTANT everything. That’s why people want a perfect ending to a war almost immediately, or they want a house they cannot afford NOW.


12 posted on 06/18/2008 6:47:15 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganomical
They've been doing this program for 3 years now. You can find links to the studies on the effectiveness at this link (bottom of the page) and at this link.
17 posted on 06/18/2008 6:53:17 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson