"What do you propose as a reason to black out the certificate number?" Well, the best reason I can think of is to sow confusion and keep Freepers awake at night. Apparently it's working. :-)
Posted on 06/23/2008 3:45:52 PM PDT by freespirited
You must have a lot of time to waste. Neither of those are original documents.
Wow! A lot of effort has gone into this. I am not sure what damning conspiracy you hope to uncover here. Are you trying to prove that he was never really born?
What are you trying to prove?
Maybe, but probably not birh certificates. The “magic date” there, is 1900. Anyone born in Hawaii after 1900 is a natural born US citizen, by defination.
Yes. If he was actually born in Hawaii. (One speculation, is that he was born in Nigeria.)
Note the lower left corner of Barack’s certificate of live birth says “Date Filed by Registrar” and on Patricia’s it says, “Date Accepted by Registrar.”
Which leads me to believe the form/paper was changed between each printing, and which takes a bit of wind out of the speculations on the border differences.
What are the dates of printing for each certificate?
Now, this is really interesting. The Obama camp needs to clear this up!
"What do you propose as a reason to black out the certificate number?" Well, the best reason I can think of is to sow confusion and keep Freepers awake at night. Apparently it's working. :-)
If the answer is in the affirmative, then why take the risk of phonying up this secondary document? The obvious answer is that the original legitimate birth certificate contains information that the Soros-anointed One would rather keep quiet. Two possibilities come to mind: (1) his mother wasn't legally married to his father at the time of his birth ("that bastard Obama" only has a nice jaunty ring to some of us), or (2) his race was listed as the same as his mother's, i.e., "Caucasian," which would rather put the cat amongst the pigeons, or the ofay amongst the TUCCers, or... you get the idea.
As a graphics professional, I cannot share the conclusions of this post. The cert looks authentic to me.
“IF NOTHING ELSE, INTIMIDATE THEM ABOUT THEIR CANDIDATE’S HONESTY.”
HUH, where’s your /sarc tag. They care nothing for his honesty or dishonesty.
That, or Obama wasn’t born in a hospital. Hawaiian hospital, that is.
I don’t believe mid-wifery was all the rage in the 60s, just the opposite.
"If he was actually born in Hawaii. (One speculation, is that he was born in Nigeria.): Well I'm going to speculate he was born on Mars and you can quote me in the next thread.
Amazing differences.
I worked with a gal named Zena. She was from Humbolt, CA. She claimed that she was not born at a hospital and didn’t get a SS# or Birth Cert for some time as a result.
Her parents were members of a “collective” or “commune”.
Maybe Obama was brought here to get a birth certificate. Hmmm?
Sleep tight. :o)
However it is an excelent example of a real certificate of live birth VS a phony one.....
Obama’s is a phony created to look real.
It isn’t a real document because even the “paper” doesn’t match what the State of Hawaii used.
If anything the “paper” is a copy of a image lighten to look real and clean.
LOL. Good point. We use a form that has four different cards printed on it, depending on orientation. Three of the cards are no longer used, however when we order the forms, they have to be exactly like the original
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.