[RKV]

You have no idea what you are saying. Google up the opinion and read it and see if you have the same idea. Of course, you might be Robert Paulsen in disguise and then it wouldn’t matter.

[Gondring]

You have no idea what you are saying.

I respectfully disagree, and suggest the statement applies more to you.

Google up the opinion and read it and see if you have the same idea.

I will, but the words of the opinion won't change the fact that the quote from it that you posted is a non-sequitur, with as much validity as "We uphold all provisions of Article IX of the Constitution."

Of course, you might be Robert Paulsen in disguise and then it wouldn’t matter.

Well, if I'm Robert Paulsen in disguise, with deep enough cover that I argue directly against the views that he used to love to express here, then what does it matter?

BTW, are you Souter, Breyer, Stevens, or Ginsburg?