Posted on 06/26/2008 10:06:20 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
The mayor should constantly wear brown pants to hide his obvious fear the peons intend to be armed.
Is Mayor Daley more afraid of this court decision, or more afraid of the youth gangs in Chicago who have weapons in violations of his laws? Is he at all afraid of the gangs who have made vast areas of his city a wasteland and a war zone?
Too bad mayor dumba**, the Supremes have upheld the constitution and you must also. Yes, it always scares dictators and those wishing to control the people when they can go freely armed. It is very telling when a politician lets his butt hang out with statements like this.
It’s hilarious how the Constitution puts that level of fear in these clowns.
It’s even scarier knowing it was a 5-4 decision that upheld it.
So the Mayor of Chicago thinks that the US Supreme Court upholding the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution is a very frightening decision.
Way to go citizens of Chicago. Thanks for voting this moron into public office.
And it will not do him a bit of good. Sorry Charley. The game is over.
I agree that a 5-4 decision is the scariest thing. Wayyyy too close.
It’s simply idiotic for liberals to think that banning guns keeps them out of the hands of criminals.
Statistics continue to prove otherwise.
Why of course Democrats like Mayor Daley is upset over this decision! This really throws a kink into the plans for Communisim for America.
I suppose free speech is very frightening too, eh, mayor?
If Obama is elected and gets to appoint radical-Liberal judges to the Supreme Court, this type of 5-4 decision will be the other way around.
“Benna Solomon, deputy corporation counsel for the city, asserted that the Supreme Court decision only applies to the federal government. Washington D.C., she said, is part of the federal government, but Chicago is an independent home-rule unit of Illinois.”
I can see their argument beginning to form from this knothead. So I’m guessing that when Scalia stated that it applies to indivduals, he only meant federal government individuals? It’s not wonder liberals are idiots, they can’t grasp simple words...sheesh.
Mayor Daley knows full well that the crime problem in his city is the fault of absent, failing parents. He can’t say that, because he needs their votes. So he goes after the law abiding citizens, blaming them and demonizing the only way they can protect themselves.
The hypocrisy is palpable: Daley has a huge, armed security detail.
The beauty of this is that crime will surely drop once the citizens ‘gun up’.
Now all we need is concealed carry.
“...Thanks for voting this moron into public office.” Him and his horse, Obama, too.
Chicago is a patriotic town. They even raised the dead to elect JFK.
Gun bans are worthless to criminals anyway, they get their guns from the black/underground market.
Freedom of Religion just stops his heart if he has one.
Personally I’m in favor of hanging anyone who passes a law later found to be unconstitutional. That includes Congress but especially applies to two-bit pocket despots such as Daley. I might be talked down to lengthy prison sentences, though.
da mare's fun to watch when flustered
I’m sure free speech is frightening to Dick Daley if you have anything bad to say about his corrupt rear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.