Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWWren

Why? So they can nominate Hillary, who’s a lot more electable than Hussein?


12 posted on 06/26/2008 1:23:24 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight
Why? So they can nominate Hillary, who’s a lot more electable than Hussein?

So true. I believe we got the runt of the Dem litter this time... and we'll need it with lame McCain.

48 posted on 06/26/2008 1:44:48 PM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

“Why? So they can nominate Hillary, who’s a lot more electable than Hussein?”

I hate to say it, but we’re probably better off with Hillary then Obama if it came down to that. I think ultimately you are right, Hillary is more electable.

Why did any negative Obama news drop off the radar when he won the nomination? The media seems to be back into fawning over Obama like they were early in the primaries.


80 posted on 06/26/2008 2:47:32 PM PDT by Free Descendant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson