The liberals, who want o change the constitution and the intent of those who wrote it are the activists and no amount of hand wringing or out and out lieing will change that.
You can’t have a citizen militia without private gun ownership and use, moron. I kept looking to see if this was satire or not... It’s amazing how liberals have a hard time reading clear language, but can find same sex marriage and abortion where there is no language that supports it.
But conservatives are ‘activists’ - Look, if we were activists, child molesters would still be on the execution list.
Chemerinsky is not a lawyer. He is a political activist, pure and simple.
didn't have to until you liberal trash tried to take away our rights.
And hey, dipstick? We are the militia.
The liberals, who want o change the constitution and the intent of those who wrote it are the activists and no amount of hand wringing or out and out lieing will change that.
EJ Dionne has been covering the same ground — the Talking Points must have gone out: If the Supreme Court pays attention to the Constitution, it is “judicial activism” and must be stopped.
This guy has a very short memory. Seems to me that the early colonists and founding fathers fought for the rights to own guns as the British attempted to seize them.
Don’t mix a liberal up with history, though. It ends for them sometime around 1962.
whatta twist of logic!
Excuse me, but doesn't the U.S. Constitution (explained by the Federalist Papers) trump precedent and laws?
When judges uphold the Constitution, they are called “activists” by liberals. When liberal judges ignore the Constitution and laws passed by Congress and make their own laws, liberals consider that perfectly reasonable.
It just highlights their double standard.
It is called the Constitution.
How about if Los Angeles decides that you DON’T have a basic right to freedom of the press?
DUmbsh**s.
Chemerinsky was one of my bar review instructors a decade or so ago. Standard-issue liberal and total bore. He’s not worthy to shine Scalia’s shoes.
In fact, the question they insist on attempting to keep open was decided. The right to bear arms is an individual right. Period. All the squinting and deconstructing and deliberate obtuseness in the world isn't going to make it ambiguous again.
"..President Clinton briefly considered Chemerinsky for an opening on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. However, his brief candidacy ended when Senate Republicans sent the word that his nomination would be dead on arrival..."
He was too nutty for the Nutty Ninth!
It’s “activism” when you uphold the ruling of a lower court and actually pay attention to the 2nd amendment. The ruling elite in this country, from the Democrat majority to the RINOS to the press is totally full of sh*t.
This guy is a professor of law at Duke University? I wonder if he was in the Group of 88.
Chemerinsky is a simpering communist who couldn’t possibly have reasd the decision. He just gravitates to these kinds of stupid comments.
What a maroon!
Only an ultra-liberal could possibly view upholding the Second Ammendment of the Constitution as being "judicial activism".
These guys truly have no shame whatsoever.
Judicial activism is making up new rights in the Constitution that aren’t there. The 2nd Amendment ruling is about protecting a right that clearly is in the Constitution.