[Vision]

Went to the Dr. this week for a cold. While I'm there she mentions that the fastest, broadest spread of HIV in the DC area is among heterosexual couples.

Seems hard to believe.

[csvset]

among heterosexual couples

You'd have to wonder about their sex and /or drug use habits.

[inflorida]

Went to the Dr. this week for a cold. While I'm there she mentions that the fastest, broadest spread of HIV in the DC area is among heterosexual couples.

I wonder if that isn't because of so-called "straight" men diddling on the side with their gay lovers.

[gathersnomoss]

Uh huh. If you believe that, then here in my suburban neighborhood south of Richmond married couples also are seeing a huge increase in AIDS.

This is for the most part a liberal disease. Don't think so?...just ask any gay person who they will vote for.

Also, ask them if they are Christian, you know, someone who reads the Bible. They are 180% out of phase.

AIDS is a politically funded, politically protected disease. Welcome to the Socialist States of America.

[krb]

Sounds plausible. Remember, if the number of infected people goes from 2 to 4, that is a 100% increase.

[massgopguy]

That’s because she lied.

[the lone wolf]

"Went to the Dr. this week for a cold. While I'm there she mentions that the fastest, broadest spread of HIV in the DC area is among heterosexual couples.

Seems hard to believe."

That is because it is hard to believe. Hundreds of additional "gay" men get GRID/AIDS and it shows up in the statistics as a 12% increase. One or two additional persons who claim to be straight get infected and it shows up as an emormous increase for heterosexuals. Just how many new infections are we talking about here?