Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smithone; djf
WaPo can quote FR as they wish.

>> Yet they sued Free Republic for quoting too much of their content. Ironic.

Yes. See the horrible double standard at play in permitting something to be STOLEN in "certain" circumstances because it is deemed NEWSWORTHY by the MSM? Guardians of the fourth estate?

FR cannot quote the WaPoo in total but there is no limit how much they can spew from FR.

103 posted on 06/29/2008 1:40:50 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: weegee

Actually, this whole WaPo thing was meant as an exercise in intimidation. They still have no legal way to go after people who say Hussein Obama is a Muslim (well, unless they want to admit that being a Muslim is a bad thing and it’s an insult to be called a Muslim!) because there’s absolutely nothing wrong in saying this. It’s personal opinion based on some known facts about him and his evasiveness about everything, and how one responds to it depends on what one thinks of Islam in general and Barry O in particular.

But Obama’s left simply wants us to know that they’re watching. When they get power, you can expect that this will be more than just watching.


109 posted on 06/29/2008 3:14:00 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson