Posted on 06/30/2008 8:11:23 PM PDT by RDTF
Former Agent Explains What Went Wrong in the Investigation
The anthrax investigation, almost from the beginning, was hampered by top-heavy leadership from high ranking, but inexperienced FBI officials, which led to a close-minded focus on just one suspect and amateurish investigative techniques that robbed agents in the field the ability operate successfully.
I saw it firsthand as one of the FBI agents assigned to the anthrax case and directly involved in the investigation of Dr. Steven Hatfill. While I cannot comment on the guilt or innocence of Hatfill, I think I have a sense of some of the things that went wrong inside the FBI and what lessons can be learned from this embarrassing case.
Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice agreed to pay $5,825,000 to Hatfill, whom former Attorney General John Ashcroft once described as "a person of interest" in the investigation into the anthrax murders of seven people in 2001.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
This sort of thing seems to be a recurring theme in high-profile law enforcement cases. Richard Jewel and the 1996 Olympic Park bombing comes to mind, as do the Beltway Shootings by Muhammed and Malvo, in which Chief Moose and crew had everyone looking for white guy in a white van.
I wonder how often this happens in non-high-profile cases, where you never learn of the official idiocy in pursuing the cases.
Ali Al-Timimi, according to the FBI, is suspected the anthrax weapons suspect of the other investigative squad.
The Al-Timimi prosecutor and the Al-Timimi defense counsel are duking it out this week in Alexandria (VA) over an indictment filed on June 26, 2008 of Dr. Sami Al-Arian who refuses to testify before a grand jury. The prosecutor was the one who had the recent success on appeal in the Fourth Circuit’s affirmance of the conviction of Al-Timimi’s colleague Benhkhala.
Turley says he can’t say who the targets of the grand jury investigation are — only the witnesses and family can choose to do so.
Al-Arian Arraigned On Contempt Charges Tampa Tribune July 1, 2008
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/jul/01/me-al-arian-arraigned-on-contempt-charges/
What went wrong was that the FBI thought that they could pick a White male and unjustly blame him for a crime and get away with it. Luckily for us all, their criminal actions were found out and an innocent man has been paid some money.
Is the F.B.I. there to capture criminals or to play smoke and mirrors with events that embarass the U.S. ( The bombing of the Murrah building, Waco, the shooting down of the jet over N.Y.) etc etc etc.
I have very little confidence in the F.B.I.
Has the agency framed anyone lately?
Has the agency killed anyone unnecessary lately?
That mail type and category receives the highest postage rates and the poorest service.
If we but imagine the AlQaida attackers dropping them in collection boxes in Boca Raton on Friday evening (Sept 7, 2001) after prayers, the odds of those particular pieces of mail ending up "lost in postal equipment" is absolutely astounding.
They'd have traveled by truck to somewhere in Pennsylvania before they'd be found in that equipment by a major mailer in New Jersey, and tossed to collection mail where they'd be canceled later at an MPC in the area.
The delay could easily be two or three weeks just for that reason.
In the meantime the attackers died in the airplanes they hijacked 4 days later.
I've detailed the complete process that would need to be followed in a series of posts over the last 7 years. Just look up "anthrax" and go all the way back to the oldest stuff in 2001. I am sure you will find it quite entertaining. Mr. Lake has several different theories, but I think he and I agree that the Anthrax Attack was of a piece with 9/11.
The Washington DC snipers were Muslim terrorists. Islam helped motivate them but they didn't belong to an organization.
Osama Bin Laden initially denied having anything to do with 9/11 at first, then eventually admitted it later on.
And for all intents and purposes they DID admit it in the letters they included with the anthrax, even though they weren't signed "Osama Bin Laden" or "Al Qaeda". The left has decided to completely ignore those letters and essentially pretend that they don't exist, but the message in them was perfectly clear for anyone who isn't in denial.
As for admitting the anthrax mailings, you are right they initially denied the 1998 embassy bombings, 911 etc. The anthrax mailings would be awkward thing to admit given that so many have yet to go to trial, such as the London-based Vanguards of Conquest spokesman Yassir al-Sirri whose extradition is sought.
In the Spring and Fall of 1999, the Blind Sheik’s assistant, Post Office employee Sattar, was in telephone communication with Deputy Military Commander Mustafa Hamza, the blind sheik’s successor Taha, London Vanguards of Conquest spokesman Yassir al-Sirri, and Cairo attorney Montasser al-Zayat. Yesterday, KSM’s assistant, al-Hawsawi, has now apparently been asked to be represented by an Egyptian lawyer, apparently Montasser al-Zayat. (He has also asked the assistance of a London counsel). The blind sheik supporters spoke on conference calls about the blind sheikh’s withdrawal of his support for the cease fire. Although suspecting his phone was wiretapped, Post Office Sattar continued to talk vaguely in code about these issues with these people, all of whom were closely connected to al-Zawahiri. This was the period Zawahiri moved forward his anthrax planning and there was a public dialogue between Bin Laden and a London cleric’s call for a holy biowar.
In 1999, US Post Office employee Sattar was frustrated with attorney al-Zayat, who he believed was spreading a rumor that Sattar worked for the CIA. Testimony from December 14, 2004 in the trial USA v. Sattar, involving co-defendant Lynne Stewart, described the position of Mustafa Hamza that the Islamic Group had no dispute with the United States so long as the Blind Sheik was released. Because of the pressure and electronic surveillance by Egyptian security services, Islamic Group was dysfunctional. For example, Hamza had first learned that he had been named military head of Islamic Group after he heard it on the Voice of Israel radio. While any representation allowed by Al-Zayat of al-Hawsawi might be similarly constrained (and dysfunctional) assuming he is not allowed access to classified evidence, Al Zayat nonetheless (from a legal defense perspective) would be a powerful and welcome addition to the defense team in a historic prosecution. I suspect he would advise any client or long-time friend to not admit to being the anthrax mailer, no matter what other friends or connections the mailer has.
Like maybe including a letter saying...
09-11-01
YOU CAN NOT STOP US.
WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX.
YOU DIE NOW.
ARE YOU AFRAID?
DEATH TO AMERICA.
DEATH TO ISRAEL.
ALLAH IS GREAT.
Oh that's right. They did send a letter saying that. They'd not gotten the FBI memo that all terrorist missives sent with biological weapons must be on al-Qaeda letterhead and accompanied by a Certificate of Authenticity from the Franklin Mint.
The sarcasm is not meant for you personally. It's for the bureaucrats that created and successfully propogated the meme that terrorists never took credit for the attack so it must be a domestic WASP.
If the exchange posted there happened, that is one damn bizarre and cryptic exchange in my book! I'm curious as to your take on it.
I find it amusing that he cites "classified information" as though that's sacred to him, as the Leaky one has never let that stop him from spilling the beans in the past.
It happened. It's available for viewing on CSPAN. Look for "Senate Judiciary Cmte. on DoJ Oversight (July 9, 2008)." It is at the 2 hour and 34 minute mark into the 2 hour and 38 minute session.
My take on it is as always: The Amerithrax investigation is an ongoing case, and details cannot be publicly discussed.
The Salafi jihadists did not merely claim responsibility. The blind sheik’s lawyer and EIJ shura members (including the military commander) announced in advance what they were going to do as early as March 1999. They then renewed the threat in late January 2001. See February 2001 PDB. The threat to use anthrax related to announcement of the EIJ #2 who had been OBL’s farm manager. Then his bail was denied on October 5, 2001 and the real deal was sent the next day.
The media and bloggers, moreover, have overlooked even the formal filing by the main suspect’s lawyer that the FBI suspects him.
No one has noticed that the lawyer for Ali Al-Timimi says the FBI considers him an “anthrax weapons suspect.” Andrew Card was the former White House Chief of Staff — Ali Al-Timimi was his assistant for 2 months when he was Secretary of the Department of Transportation in 1996. That would explain the awkwardness of dealing with the issue more straightforwardly.
Al-Timimi was a microbiologist who had worked in the building housing the “Center for Biodefense” funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (”DARPA”). He came to have an office 15 feet from the leading anthrax scientist and the former deputy commander of USAMRIID. See recent Fox News report on Amerithrax.
Dr. Al-Timimi’s counsel summarizes:
“we know Dr. Al-Timimi:
* was interviewed in 1994 by the FBI and Secret Service regarding his ties to the perpetrators of the first World Trade Center bombing;
* was referenced in the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing (”Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US”) as one of seventy individuals regarding whom the FBI is conducting full field investigations on a national basis;
* was described to his brother by the FBI within days of the 9-11 attacks as an immediate suspect in the Al Qaeda conspiracy;
* was contacted by the FBI only nine days after 9-11 and asked about the attacks and its perpetrators;
* was considered an anthrax weapons suspect;
[redacted]
* was described during his trial by FBI agent John Wyman as having “extensive ties” with the “broader al-Qaeda network”;
* was described in the indictment and superseding indictment as being associated with terrorists seeking harm to the United States;
* was a participant in dozens of international overseas calls to individuals known to have been under suspicion of Al-Qaeda ties like Al-Hawali; and
* was associated with the long investigation of the Virginia Jihad Group.
***
The conversation with [Bin Laden’s sheik] Al-Hawali on September 19, 2001 was central to the indictment and raised at trial. Al-Timimi called Dr. Hawali after the dinner with Kwon on September 16, 2001 and just two hours before he met with Kwon and Hassan for the last time on September 19, 2001.
[911 imam] Anwar Al-Aulaqi goes directly to Dr. Al-Timimi’s state of mind and his role in the alleged conspiracy. The 9-11 Report indicates that Special Agent Ammerman interviewed Al-Aulaqi just before or shortly after his October 2002 visit to Dr. Al-Timimi’s home to discuss the attacks and his efforts to reach out to the U.S. government.
[IANA head] Bassem Khafagi was questioned about Dr. Al-Timimi before 9-11 in Jordan, purportedly at the behest of American intelligence. [redacted ] He was specifically asked about Dr. Al-Timimi’s connection to Bin Laden prior to Dr. Al-Timimi’s arrest. He was later interviewed by the FBI about Dr. Al-Timimi. Clearly, such early investigations go directly to the allegations of Dr. Al-Timimi’s connections to terrorists and Bin Laden — [redacted]”
The letter by Al-Timimi’s counsel attached as an exhibit is equally meaty. An example of an additional detail is that in March 2002, Dr. Al-Timimi spoke with Dr. Al-Hawali (Bin Laden’s sheik who was the subject of OBL’s “Declaration of War”) about assisting Moussaoui in his defense.
The filing and the letter exhibit each copy defense co-counsel, the daughter of the lead prosecutor in Amerithrax. That prosecutor has pled the Fifth Amendment concerning all the leaks hyping a “POI” of the other Amerithrax squad, Dr. Steve Hatfill.
In an e-mail obtained by FOX News, scientists at Fort Detrick openly discussed how the anthrax powder they were asked to analyze after the attacks was nearly identical to that made by one of their colleagues.
“Then he said he had to look at a lot of samples that the FBI had prepared ... to duplicate the letter material.” “Then the bombshell. He said that the best duplication of the material was the stuff made by [name redacted]. He said that it was almost exactly the same — his knees got shaky and he sputtered, ‘But I told the General we didn’t make spore powder!’”
FOX News reports:
“The FBI has narrowed its focus to ‘about four’ suspects in the 6 1/2-year investigation of the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001, and at least three of those suspects are linked to the Army’s bioweapons research facility at Fort Detrick in Maryland, FOX News has learned.
Among the pool of suspects are three scientists — a former deputy commander, a leading anthrax scientist and a microbiologist — linked to the research facility, known as USAMRIID.”
It thus appears that the FBI’s theory is that it was more than a happy coincidence for Ayman Zawahiri that an active supporter of the Taliban and supporter of jihad was a US biodefense insider. Microbiologist Al-Timimi worked in the same building as famed Russian bioweapons scientist Ken Alibek and former USAMRIID Deputy Commander and Acting Commander Charles Bailey, who would publish a lot of research with the “Ames strain” of anthrax. Al-Timimi was a current associate and former student of Bin Laden’s spiritual advisor, dissident Saudi Sheik al-Hawali. Ali would speak along with the blind sheik’s son at charity conferences — the blind sheik’s son served on Al Qaeda’s WMD committee. Al-Timimi’s mentor Bilal Philips was known for recruiting members of the military to jihad. The first week after 9/11, FBI agents questioned Al-Timimi. He was a microbiology graduate student in a program jointly run by George Mason University and the American Type Culture Collection (”ATCC”). Ali, according to his lawyer, had been questioned by an FBI agent and Secret Service agent in 1994 after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He had a high security clearance for work for the Navy in the late 1990s. In 1996, for two months had worked for the White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card when he was Secretary of Transportation. As time off from his university studies permitted, Ali was an active speaker with the charity Islamic Assembly of North America whose spin-off had its office 1 mile from me. The CIA has known all of this since at least mid-December 2001.
Pook,
Mr. Card was Secretary of Transportation in 1992 -1993. So if Ali’s defense committee’s webpage was right that it was in 1996, the webpage sentence meant that he worked for former Secretary in 1996 at some other job (like head of the auto trade association).
Zack (I just wanted folks to know that any mistakes are Pook’s fault)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.