Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky
Do you think this web site is a good source?

For the usual quick answer layman's questions, probably. But the lawyer would always prefer to look at the statute and in the modern world that is usually not difficult.

Note that you say, In 1986 this was changed to 5 years before the age of 14 and 2 years after the age of 14. (So some may say he fits in this, but I don't see anywhere where it says it was retroactive . . . .)

The statute is quoted above in #148. The people that want to give the 1986 amendment retroactive application are incorrect.

The statute in its current codification is 8 USCA Sec. 1401(g). The amendments, referenced to the public law in which they were enacted are cited below the statute. The effective dates of the amendments are then cited in the afternotes below the public law references.

The current version of (g) was adopted by Public Law 99-653 which was effective with respect "to persons born on or after November 14, 1986." So the amendment, by its terms, is clearly not retroactive.

Some are confused by the flush language at the end of (g) which give retroactive effect to "this proviso" however the "proviso" reference is to the language beginning ""Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States. . . . " which has no application to the present situation.

To find the earlier version of (g), you need to see in the amendment descriptions that the subsections of 1401 were renumbered by the amendment--so Sec. 1401(7) became 1401(g).

In addition, my memory is that there was another version of (7) before it was modified to the 1986 version which had the 10 and 5 year residence rules keyed to age 21, not age 14. My memory may be incorrect however even if so, the rule in 61 when Obama claims to have been born would have been five years after age 14 and since his mother was only 18 when he was born, she still flunks the test.

Bottom line is that absent a naturalization proceeding, if Obama was born in Kenya as appears from the record, he is not even a US Citizen.

209 posted on 07/02/2008 7:26:10 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: David

Bottom line is that absent a naturalization proceeding, if Obama was born in Kenya as appears from the record, he is not even a US Citizen.


This seems to be the crux of the matter.

IF- it is true- the ramifications for the country are alarming. When is this going to be disclosed- or if not ture- otherwise put to rest...


210 posted on 07/02/2008 7:35:40 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

To: David
"Some are confused by the flush language at the end of (g) which give retroactive effect to "this proviso" however the "proviso" reference is to the language beginning ""Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States. . . . " which has no application to the present situation."

When I first read this part that I have put in bold is what I thought also at the time I first came across it, but I am no lawyer and it does get confusing. So when I read your post and you said that was the correct interpretation I was glad to see my first impression was correct.

You said if your memory was correct, the ruling in 61 when he was born was 5 years after 14 so she would have to have been 19 and she was 18. What I remember the rule in 61 was 5 years after the age of 16.

Thanks for your information.

215 posted on 07/02/2008 8:15:41 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson