Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Oil Chutzpah
National Review ^ | 7/2/2008 | NRO editors

Posted on 07/02/2008 8:46:07 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko

We’re surprised that Sen. Chuck Schumer can keep straight which foreign countries he’s haranguing to pump more oil and which he’s haranguing to stop pumping more oil. A few weeks ago the New York senator and aspiring global Petroleum Czar was threatening to block arms sales to Saudi Arabia if it didn’t produce more oil. Now, he’s outraged that the Iraqi government may give modest no-bid service contracts to Western oil companies as a first step toward more fully exploiting the country’s vast oil reserves. Perhaps Sen. Schumer would approve if the Saudis were to agree to pump the Iraq oil?

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: energy; iraqioil; oil; schumer; theputzofputzes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2008 8:46:07 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

They obviously want anyone but Americans to make money off of the oil boom. Only a Democrat could come up with thinking like this.


2 posted on 07/02/2008 8:50:44 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Hey, Chuckie! Victory sucks, eh?


3 posted on 07/02/2008 8:51:57 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

“A few weeks ago the New York senator and aspiring global Petroleum Czar was threatening to block arms sales to Saudi Arabia if it didn’t produce more oil.”

That and suing OPEC...good thinking on the part of the lobotomized left.


4 posted on 07/02/2008 8:55:27 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
"That and suing OPEC...good thinking on the part of the lobotomized left."

Don't forget the American Conference of Mayors pi$$ing off the Canadians to the point where they have begun looking for ways to sell the Alberta Oil Sand output on the world market instead of to the U.S.

5 posted on 07/02/2008 9:00:11 AM PDT by anoldafvet (Is this what Obama voters consider change. A change of position on every issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

Schumer the tumor.


6 posted on 07/02/2008 9:05:47 AM PDT by y6162 (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Schumer is proof of a broken government. I don’t think he is even capable of developing a rational policy on anything that is in the best interests of America. It’s all about politicking and grandstanding. The citizens of New York elected a second-rate carnival barker to the United States Senate.


7 posted on 07/02/2008 9:06:49 AM PDT by henkster (Politics is the art of telling a bigger and more believable lie more often than your opponent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
he’s outraged that the Iraqi government may give modest no-bid service contracts to Western oil companies as a first step toward more fully exploiting the country’s vast oil reserves.

If he was a true American with America's interest at heart, he would be promoting and encouraging the Iraq government to choose American companies.

American workers should be pi**ed at this scum bag.

8 posted on 07/02/2008 9:07:00 AM PDT by WesternPacific (I am tired of voting for the lesser of two evils!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

9 posted on 07/02/2008 9:08:04 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Why in heaven’s name should we go begging for the Saudis to pump more oil when we have more oil reserves in the USA than they do? Wouldn’t it make more sense to have US companies drill for oil in the US? The only drilling the Democrats want to do is in people’s wallets to extract more in taxes.


10 posted on 07/02/2008 9:24:57 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
Roughly 3 million, or about 43 percent, of New York households -- more than any other state -- use oil for heat.

New Yorkers are about to get a practical lesson in Economics 101.

11 posted on 07/02/2008 9:30:58 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
"Wouldn’t it make more sense to have US companies drill for oil in the US?"

It does drive one crazy doesn't it?  I hear the left screaming that big oil doesn't invest enough in alternative energy.  What? Big oil is very, very good at poking holes in the Earth and extracting oil from it.  As a small investor in oil companies, I'd be upset if they were taking my money and applying it to anything other than what they have been successful at doing for the last 150 years.

I keep hearing a consistent mantra that we can't drill our way out of this oil crisis?  Really?  Since nearly our entire economy runs on oil, how exactly do they expect us to get more oil if we don't drill?  Wish it out of the ground?  I read a comment that it's like saying one can't drink their way out of dehydration.

Oil companies in the U.S. have paid more than twice the amount of money to the federal government in taxes than they've earned in profit.  Doesn't seem fair does it?

As far as this crud that drilling won't supply oil for another five to ten years, do these idiots really believe that wind power or solar energy or even a nuclear plant can fill the gap tomorrow?  It will take a lot longer than five years.  In fact a DOE document that I post in FR several months ago says that by 2030, alternative energy will only supply 9% of our needs.

These guys are not looking out for our best interests.

12 posted on 07/02/2008 9:42:03 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

While Chuck Schumer and the democrats are chasing after castles in the air, the ruskies, the arabs and other non-democratic states are digging our graves with oil profits.

There is no evidence that oil is created solely by dead dinosaurs. Hydrocarbons abound on Titan. Peak Oil or (that’s all there is and its running out) is a scare tactic that most are too afraid to oppose for fear of standing up for rational thought. Oil is there for the taking but enough of us have lost the will to survive that the entire nation is doomed. We are not a has-been nation whose time in the sun is over simply because we are afraid of hydrocarbons....

It’s time to survive and not dream of what if.... You can’t put a gun to the heads of scientists and engineers and command them to ‘invent’ us out of the need for oil.....there are no new technologies that can prevent us from starving to death and imploding into civil-war depression in the next 5 years. Oil is the name of the game in spite of the energy-anorexic liberal mantra of alternative fuels...


13 posted on 07/02/2008 9:46:16 AM PDT by x_plus_one (let them eat cake, drive small electric cars and take the bus..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
"New Yorkers are about to get a practical lesson in Economics 101. "

It's really amazing how the environmental tuning fork in each person can change it's tune when it hits one's pocketbook.It only took about six weeks for the polls to turn completely in favor of drilling for oil. 

Paycheck to paycheck voters will become increasingly disenchanted with inflated prices due to the price of oil and as you said... when they start filling their heating tanks this fall they're going to feel totally helpless. When your children are freezing, you'll burn old tires to stay warm and say to hell with the environment.

It's easy to be a liberal when you can afford to waste money.

14 posted on 07/02/2008 9:53:22 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

“environmental tuning fork in each person can change it’s tune”

Nicely turned phrase.


15 posted on 07/02/2008 9:56:50 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
Senator Schumer:

bumper-sticker
 
 

Contact your Congress critters to let them know that you are tired of high gas prices.

U. S. Senate

U. S. House of Representatives

16 posted on 07/02/2008 10:05:07 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Interesting chart. Keep posting it!


17 posted on 07/02/2008 10:06:16 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
I really don't see what the problem is with the United States using its military power to protect its vital economic interests. It's a better reason for going to war than most. Our economy is, always has been, and always will be, dependent on trade and natural resources from abroad. That will be the case even if we do become "energy independent".

We've been going to war to protect our commercial interests since the earliest days of the Republic. Even Jefferson, who was at least as much an anti-Wall Street (in his day, the "monied aristocracy") firebrand as Chuck Schumer, wasn't afraid to bombard a couple Arab cities in order to protect our Mediterranian trade routes. We had soldiers, sailors, and Marines continuously stationed in China for about a century, c.1850 to 1948. They weren't there because we feared a Chinese invasion.

Loss of trade and resources is just as serious a threat to our way of life as any military or terrorist attack. After all, what do you suppose did more damage to this country in the long run, Hitler, or the Great Depression? Last I checked, it wasn't the Wehrmacht enforcing the New Deal. Not to mention, World War II had more than a little to do with oil itself.

We do a lot of trading and get a lot of vital resources from trading partners in very dangerous dangerous parts of the world surrounded by people who covet what they have. Sometimes, they aren't able to protect what they have. If we want to buy it, then we have to be willing to help protect it.

Now maybe some people think using government military force to protect our commercial interests is a bloody form of "corporate welfare", but someone has to do it, and we don't let corporations do it themselves. Now, I don't see the Democrats lining up to allow corporations to arm their own expeditionary forces, so it seems to me that the only option is to spill a little "blood for oil" or let every tin-plated warlord around the world eat our lunch.

It ain't pretty, but the real world usually isn't. We'll never have a successful and coherent foreign policy until we get over our handwringing, "no blood for capitalism" mentality.

/ rant
18 posted on 07/02/2008 10:44:26 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
Very well put and I agree wholeheartedly. 
19 posted on 07/02/2008 11:36:36 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

These pols get a little testy when they don’t get their palms greased. Iraq hasn’t learned how to play the democrat game yet.


20 posted on 07/02/2008 3:24:42 PM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson