Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Report Indicates Voters Most Interested in Barack Obama’s Position on Abortion
LifeNews.com ^ | July 3, 2008 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/03/2008 6:20:41 AM PDT by rhema

A new report shows voters are interested in the position Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama takes on abortion. The Internet traffic monitoring firm HitWise indicates abortion is now the number one political issue voters are looking for when they conduct a search on Obama’s campaign web site.

Hitwise analyzed the top 200 U.S. search terms that sent visits to the presidential candidates’ websites for the first half of 2008, revealing the types of content searched for the most among Internet users.

Issues like education, the environment, health care and immigration are important to visitors on Obama’s web site, but HitWise says abortion tops them all.

In the first quarter of 2008, abortion came in as the number two most important issue on the minds of voters looking to Obama’s web site to learn more about him. As news of Obama’s pro-abortion position has filtered throughout the nation, the abortion search term moved up to the top spot over the last three months.

McCain’s pro-life position on abortion must be more clear to voters as abortion came in as the third most important issue in searches on his web site in the first quarter but slipped out of the top five in the second quarter.

Heather Dougherty, research director for HitWise, says the topics that voters put in searches on the candidate web sites, give an indication of what political issues are most prominent on their minds.

“This has implications for what content should be featured on the candidates’ websites, and broadly across all communications with voters,” she said.

With Obama as a newer candidate with a surge in interest and popularity, his campaign web site receives 79.25 percent of online visits when compared with the traffic of the McCain site. But Hitwise shows McCain’s web site is increasing in traffic as he moved from 14.62 percent in May.

This represents a seven percent increase compared to May 2008 and a five percent increase over April 2008 traffic McCain’s web site received.

McCain’s web site is also receiving more traffic from new visitors than Obama’s. In June 2008, Barack Obama’s website received 55 percent of its visits from returning visitors and 45 percent from new visitors. McCain’s website received 21 percent of its visits from returning visits and 79 percent from new visitors.

Among all U.S. websites, both candidates saw increases in visits as Obama’s website increased 1,367 percent and McCain’s website increased 2200 percent compared to June 2007.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; mccain; obama; prolife

1 posted on 07/03/2008 6:20:41 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411; wagglebee; cpforlife.org; MHGinTN
In the first quarter of 2008, abortion came in as the number two most important issue on the minds of voters looking to Obama’s web site to learn more about him. As news of Obama’s pro-abortion position has filtered throughout the nation, the abortion search term moved up to the top spot over the last three months.
2 posted on 07/03/2008 6:22:08 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

His position??

Standing and applauding as helpless babies are torn from the womb and murdered.


3 posted on 07/03/2008 6:28:24 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

If they are interested on his position on abortion, well he approves of the killing of innocent babies even after they are born.

People might also be interested then on his position on Bisexuality and Larry Sinclair.


4 posted on 07/03/2008 6:35:39 AM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Well, he doesn’t want his daughter to be burdened with a baby.
Also -
See this post by ETL for a list.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2039978/posts?page=7#7


5 posted on 07/03/2008 6:38:57 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

“....he approves of the killing of innocent babies even after they are born.”

Obama LED the opposition to a bill that would have ensured that a baby who survived an abortion be given medical care. He was the LEADER of this opposition. In my opinion, this demonstrates Senator Obama’s complete lack of foundational moral principle. If he can be so immoral in THIS area, he will be immoral in others as well. No solid foundational principles.....


6 posted on 07/03/2008 6:46:08 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Abortion has been the #1 issue in the country for a long time now. I asked a friend of mine recently why he consistently votes Democrat despite the fact that he's a pro-2A, anti-tax, pro-WOT type of guy. After some mumbling he blurted out "abortion!" ....as if he were almost embarrassed about it.

Alas, he's far from alone in being brainwashed that securing "a woman's right to choose" takes precedence over every other issue. ...despite the fact that, in contrast to the other issues I mentioned above, "a woman's right to choose" doesn't directly affect him personally. Guess he gave it some thought, because he just recently informed me he'll be voting Republican for the first time in his life in Nov.

I'm convinced that the only issue keeping countless voters on the Democrat plantation is the abortion issue.

7 posted on 07/03/2008 6:46:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I don’t understand why there isn’t a single MSM reporter who puts Obama’s record in perpective.

Mr Obama, yes or no:

1 ARe you for reparations to blacks for the financial losses incurred due to slavery?
2. ARe you for hand gun control in Chicago?
3. ARe you for late term abortion?
4. ARE you for higher corporate taxes?
5. ARe you for off shore drilling?
6. Are you for putting a hold on space exploration?
etc


8 posted on 07/03/2008 6:54:33 AM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president of the US should be a Jackie Robinson, not a Jackie come lately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
And the 2nd amendment is the largest reason that former RATS started voting Republican.

More than 50% of UAW autoworkers now vote Republican and that is their major reason.

9 posted on 07/03/2008 7:08:42 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

In partial birth abortion, the baby is pulled partially from the birth canal, and an instument is inserted into its skull to suck out its brain.
Obama voted against any sort of medical or any other help for those babies who survived abortion, but to ‘shelve’ them and leave them to die unaided.


10 posted on 07/03/2008 7:18:58 AM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Just because people are “interested” in his position and check out the site, doesn’t mean they “approve.”


11 posted on 07/03/2008 7:23:13 AM PDT by McKayopectate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Says a lot about the dim party. The most important issue to them is keeping it legal to execute babies.


12 posted on 07/03/2008 7:27:24 AM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
he doesn’t want his daughter to be burdened with a baby.

The phrase was actually 'punished with a baby'.

13 posted on 07/03/2008 7:27:30 AM PDT by tbpiper (NObama '08 - Unfit in any color)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

I find it interesting to note that Obama is FOR killing innocent infants....but against war. Hmmmmmmm.....


14 posted on 07/03/2008 7:29:29 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhema

keep helping out those search engines folks!

Obama abortion.
Obama infanticide.
Barak Obama dead babies.
Barak Obama supports infanticide.


15 posted on 07/03/2008 7:33:29 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Thanks. I stand corrected. I tried to find an FR thread. It may have helped if I used “punished with a baby”.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?SX=486ce9864ea9ac3dd8accc5c04b40c3bbf7910f2;m=all;o=time;q=deep;s=punished%20with%20a%20baby

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1994780/posts


16 posted on 07/03/2008 7:37:44 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mimaw

Yep. Of course they’ve been successfully brainwashed by the far-left activist loons that abortion isn’t execution, and that life doesn’t begin at conception. In my view the best way to counter this fatally flawed view is by showing them just how human babies in the womb are. Having children themselves often does the trick.


17 posted on 07/03/2008 7:40:07 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“despite the fact that, in contrast to the other issues I mentioned above, “a woman’s right to choose” doesn’t directly affect him personally.”

It does affect him personally though. Well maybe not directly if he’s not at a point in his life where his significant other will be faced with the choice of aborting his child, but for men in general, abortion definitely affects them personally. When their children are killed without them being able to do anything to protect them, which is arguably a father’s greatest instinct, they are affected. On the other side, when they get someone pregnant and she insists she’s having the baby and he has to pay child support, he’s affected (though not nearly as devestated; I haven’t heard of men killing themselves because they had to pay child support, but maybe I’m just not looking hard enough).

I have encountered plenty of pro-choice men, and mostly younger men. Some think it will make them look enlightened and get them dates. Some don’t want to take responsibility when they have sex and get someone pregnant. Some genuinely buy into the pro-choice line. And then there are those who mistakingly believe that they have no say because they can’t get pregnant. “It’s a women’s issue.” No. It’s a human rights issue that has deep societal ramnifications and affects everyone, regardless of gender.


18 posted on 07/03/2008 7:42:31 AM PDT by lymelady (I have too much respect for women to ever be a feminazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

No doubt — the Left’s sustained attack on the 2A has brought a lot of folks over to the GOP in recent years. Seems an increasing number of citizens are now aware of their 2A rights.


19 posted on 07/03/2008 7:45:06 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lakeman
Standing and applauding as helpless babies are torn from the womb and murdered.

Or left to die once born. He's a monster who will bring CHANGE. There's no doubt about that.

20 posted on 07/03/2008 7:59:32 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema

This is Obama’s future for the American family:


Barack Obama Doesn’t Want His Daughters ‘Punished’ With a Baby

http://youtube.com/watch?v=eNzmly28Bmg


Obama Is the Most Pro-Abortion Candidate Ever

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.asp?Page=/Commentary/archive/200801/COM20080109b.html


Born Alive Veterans for Truth against Obama

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53617


Obama Wants to Kill Defense of Marriage Act

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/354880.aspx


Obama: Repeal Defense of Marriage Act

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=27510


21 posted on 07/03/2008 8:00:34 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Interesting that Democrats value murdering babies in the womb above everything else. How could any religious person vote for that?


22 posted on 07/03/2008 8:06:35 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

That sounds like hopeful news. If they care about it enough to look it up, then maybe once they find out he supports abortion it will make them reject him. I hope McCain is planning on making a lot of noise about abortion during the campaign since it is one of the few positions where he has been consistently conservative and different than Obama so it will give people a clear choice.


23 posted on 07/03/2008 8:11:00 AM PDT by CatherinePPP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

24 posted on 07/03/2008 8:13:01 AM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available FREE at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
New Report Indicates Voters Most Interested in Barack Obama’s Position on Abortion

Deal Hudson: Obama and Infanticide?

Ad asks Obama: ‘If fatherhood begins at conception, when does life begin?’

Embryonic stem-cell research immoral, unnecessary, bishops say

Catholics should not vote for Obama

Catholic Caucus: It is a sin to vote/support Obama/DNC [abortion]

More Catholics leaning towards Democrats, poll reports (really not Catholics)

The Catholic-Obama Problem (Pope Benedict XVI instructs Catholics about pro-abortion candidates)

Obama's Abortion Bombshell: Unrestricted Abortion....

NARAL Catholics Line Up for Obama

Editorial: Disagreeing with Doug Kmiec One More Time

State-Funded Embryo Research "Makes Taxpayers Complicit in Killing", say Bishops

McCain Meets Privately with Fr. Pavone - Says Constitutional Right to Life Applies to Unborn

Faithful Citizenship: “Catholic Vote” is very sought after

Has Obama dissolved his Catholic advisory council?

Commentary: Faithful Citizenship and the Formed Conscience

Catholic League: Where's Obama's 'Catholic Advisory Council'? [Not to be found!]

Right-wing Christians beginning to lean left (Misleading headline)

Catholics Debate Obama Vote

US Bishops Urge Voters to Give Priority to Life [Ecumenical]

Corralling the Catholic vote: Political necessity or pipe dream?

DOUG KMIEC: Catholic Reasons for Hope in the General Election

EDITORIAL: Why This Catholic Dreads the Campaign

The Catholic-Obama Problem (Pope Benedict XVI instructs Catholics about pro-abortion candidates)

Thoughts On ‘Roman Catholics For Obama’

How Obama's Catholics Will Dodge the Infanticide Question

Catholic Pro-Life Leader Feuds With Barack Obama's "Catholic" Backers

McCain and the Pope: McCain cannot win in November without the Catholic vote (Reagan re-visited?)

Catholics Cannot Vote for Pols Who Support Abortion, Except for Morally Grave Reasons: KY Bishops

25 posted on 07/03/2008 8:21:14 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC; lakeman; antonius
Thanks to antonius for this graphic:


26 posted on 07/03/2008 8:22:36 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Lots of thread linked for you already.


27 posted on 07/03/2008 8:24:21 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
No Christian/Catholic can in right conscience vote for this baby killer! (If Catholic, they are excommunicating themselves by voting for Obama.

enter the Table of Contents of the Catechism of the Catholic Church here

1: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2271  (618 bytes )  preview document matches
1 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion,
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2271.htm
97%**********

2: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2272  (580 bytes )  preview document matches
2 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2272.htm
96%**********

3: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2322  (290 bytes )  preview document matches
2 From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a "criminal" practice (GS 27 § 3),
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2322.htm
96%**********

4: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2274  (554 bytes )  preview document matches
gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2274.htm

28 posted on 07/03/2008 8:26:59 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rhema
McCain will probably get the serious pro-life vote. Pro-lifers won't sit this one out. As problematic as McCain is on stem-cell research, do people think pro-lifers will take a pass when the alternative candidate is pro-infanticide?!

Although McCain's thinking is about stem-cell research is mistaken and confused, when it came time to adopt the Indian baby from the orphanage what did he do? I am fully aware of McCain's shortcomings, but whatever you think of the McCains, to adopt that child the way they did is pro-life.

I should add that many in the pro-life movement are Catholics. One should not forget that Cindy McCain received that child from one of Mother Theresa's orphanages. If this fact were more widely known it would certainly win some votes among Catholics, who pretty much compose the proverbial "swing vote."

BTW, are there not some pics of Cindy McCain with Mother Theresa? Putting them out there would be smaltzy and a little manipulative, but they certainly would present a great contrast to the O-man's spiritual mentors: Mother Theresa vs Pastor "G-D America" Wright. McCain would probably think it's undignified, but the sooner he realizes he's in for a fight the better. This is a presidential election, so no more "above the fray" BS. Putting out a pic of Cindy and Mother Theresa would be a little manipulative, but it would also point out a substantive difference between the candidates. That would be completely fair.

It's not just that Obama is pro-abortion. If some poor wretched creature survives the abortion attempt, Obama would still allow you to "off" it. That is so sickening, I can't imagine that anyone could allow it. Yet Obama would. You would think some sort of instinct would kick in to save an abortion survivor, but not in Obama's case.

When you look at the range of issues and attitudes they support, it's the Obamas whose souls are sick, not America's. If they want to "cure America's soul," let them cure themselves first.

29 posted on 07/03/2008 8:41:00 AM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

very clever idea..

Something that can fill time during those boring conference calls!!!


30 posted on 07/03/2008 8:59:27 AM PDT by pinkpanther111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lymelady

Nice to “see” you again, LL. Hope all is well with you.


31 posted on 07/03/2008 4:07:19 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rhema
What kills me about Obama, is that he's either (1)intellectually inconsistent to the point of incoherence, or (2) a damned liar when it comes to abortion.

Jill Stanek lays out very well how Obama first said he didn't think the born-alive infant met the 14th Amendment's qualifications as a "person" in the Constitutional sense of the word (what qualifications??) and then he changed his tune and said he would have "supported the Born-Alive Infant Act in Illinois if it had had the same provisions as the Federal Act, which stated that it would not impact Roe vs Wade."

First of all, when the Act was re-introduced into the IL legislature in a form identical to the Federal act, he blocked it from being voted upon, and furthermore, there was nothing, no clause or disclaimer of codicil, in the Federal act that stated that it would have no impact on Roe vs Wade.

Yet even Barbara Boxer, a reliable abortion enthusiast, voted in favor of the Born Alive Infants Act.

Obama is glib. But if you follow his position, he gives you whiplash.

32 posted on 07/04/2008 8:31:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light." 2 Corinthians 11:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, and ultimately that will end abortion. Church leaders are finally stepping up to the plate and telling the faithful that a vote for a pro-abortion politician is a vote for evil and God will ask them about that vote in the final reckoning.
33 posted on 08/30/2008 9:19:16 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Stand up and pray up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson