Aren’t the security guards in the SC building armed?
This is cafeteria constitution. Just pick what part of it you want to follow or not?
The rats want to pick only part of the sentence that is the 2d amendment and ignore the rest.
Now they’ll say that we can KEEP arms but only locked away somewhere and totally ignore the “AND BEAR” part as if it wasn’t there.
Then we’ll hear that the phrase “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” doesn’t really mean SHALL NOT it means “REASONABLE” INFRINGEMENTS. That puts us back to square one because they’ll reason away the right.
Daley's reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling last week (D.C. v. Heller) overturning the Washington, D.C. ban on gun ownership was as predictable as it was incoherent. In one of his signature assaults on logic, Daley, a known enemy of modern contrivances like "facts", deftly managed to completely mischaracterize the Court's holding
I heard him on WLS-AM (during Rush's commercial breaks) and I swear his head was ready to explode. You could envision the drool running down his chin during his nonsensical tirade.
He was truly pathetic at that press conference, like a whiny little kid backed into a corner by his angry mother. Who the heck is voting for someone like that?
The day Chicago loses its battle against the 2nd Amendment and open carry is legal in the confines will be the day I will have a very large self satisfied smile on my face.
L