Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SVTCobra03
Think you nailed it - but other 'special' operations elements (not SF) are into the training and organizing thing these days as well.
However, as I understand it, their path to that role is different and the goals are more conventional than I was taught.

Another thought - are 'they' still pissed over old (?) ties with the agency that shall not be named?

(A few years back, my introduction to a new VP began with his asking me about military experience, followed with my telling him it included assignment with Special Forces, then his glowing description of dropping the tail ramp and taxiing while troopers burned out on their ATVs, dune buggies, scooters and such...
and then...
my very respectful and subdued...WHAT?

All of which was an improvement over the seventies, when I mentioned SF and someone asked what instrument I played.)

16 posted on 07/03/2008 5:47:52 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: norton

I think the legs and ring-knockers have been jealous of SF since Nam. Unconventional warriors don’t fit the profile or paradigm of the typical soldier. SF soldiers are more flexible and possess the ability to think outside the box. They have to be able to communicate effectively with indigenous forces which involves being able to understand, empathize and motivate them to perform on the battlefield. Navy and Marine Corps special operators are really commandos and shock troops and are not trained for counterinsurgency missions like Army SF.


21 posted on 07/03/2008 7:15:18 PM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson