Posted on 07/05/2008 4:01:45 PM PDT by Syncro
Obama doesnt need the Code Pink/MoveOn vote any longer. In fact, this sends a clear signal that Obama considers them a millstone rather than a life preserver at this stage of the campaign.With that comes a loss of power. They have never been more than a pimple on the backside of lefties anyway, peopled by the dregs of society.
They make fools of themselves where ever they appear.
Heck, they are a bunch of witches.
Which they desiginated Themselves As
LOL
>>Pat Dowd, a longtime Charlottesville resident who participated in protests in Washington in the early 1970s, said young people are not as politically active as they once were.
We really thought we could change the world when we were kids, Dowd said. Kids [today] dont have that feeling.
Nothing sadder than a person who will not grow up.
Um...Jude only has one chapter.
Like I said many times here before, code pink shouldn’t be walking the streets let alone protesting anything or anyone. They ALL should be in prison for treason.
These are the same pigs that gave money to terrorists in Iraq. The ones who are killing our soldiers.
I don't know. I've been finding it much more difficult to communicate with the Taliban and Al Queda by phone and email since my liberties were trampled. Plus you conveniently forget all those people you know Bush would have in the gulag right now, were it for me and others protecting them by speaking truth to power. So there.
And what you taught them was that your free speech has NOT been impinged. You were not handcuffed, imprisoned, hung on the gallows, or shot.
What you did was in extremely poor taste under the circumstances and blatant evidence that it is "all about you." Ho-hum.
Try pulling this nonsense in Cuba, Iran, China, North Korea, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, or any number of other places in the world, and see what happens.
Lady, and I use the term loosely, you should be teaching your kids to kiss the precious ground they walk on that has been paid for in blood.
>And if the Pres were a Rat they would be foursquare in favor of the exact same war. Loonies.
Serbia.
One thing I had never thought was the commandment thou shall not kill.
Then I listened to Dr. Savage.
He says that the true translation in his opinion from Jewish scholors that he believes is that “Thou shall not murder.”
It made me ponder. David & Goliath being a good example. The red sea falling on the egypians another. Why if killing is evil would it be done.
It’s “murder” the killing of an innocent that’s a crime. Thus war can have it’s point. Like WWII among current others.
The lefties use “Who would Jesus bomb?” because they don’t understand that Jesus didn’t come to change the law... he came to provide salavation in case we fall short.
Nitpickers.
Why is it that conservatives can make their point just by speaking or writing, whereas liberals seem to need props and costumes?
Yes they do, you a$$, they are in the military, protecting your sorry butt and making it possible for you to make a fool of yourself.
'Murder' is a legal word, 'Kill' is not a legal word. Every murder is a killing, but every killing is not a murder.
Dennis Prager, as well as Dr Savage, discusses the original use of the word 'murder' in the 10 commandments. It is indeed 'Thou shall not murder.'
Today, murder is the intentional killing of another human being with malice aforethought. Self defense killing is not murder, for example.
Jewish law also distinguishes between murder and killing. Murder is what the commandment is speaking about. It is not a general mandate to never kill.
I was using Howard Dean's bible....the one with Job in the New Testament.
This woman is really stupid. Thomas Jefferson was the writer of the Declaration of Independence. James Madison is credited with the writing of the Constitution.
When Jesus returns to rule, with a word of His tongue He destroys His enemies. He doesn’t need a bomb.
Rev 19:15 & 16 NASV
“15 From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.
16And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”
I wonder if election handicappers have adequately considered the possibility of a Obama/Far Left split as he desperately tries to escape the territory he has staked out in Kos/DU/Soros land.
15 From His mouth comes a sharp sword....
The left will still blame Bush.
“We just want to state our constitutional right that someone who has destroyed our Constitution should not be at the home of a president who initiated it. That seems very disrespectful to the memory of Thomas Jefferson.
*snorts*
This guy’s one to talk, considering the party he no doubt supports is the one actually destroying our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
I also learned that the word used in the “thou shall not kill” commandment translates as “murder”. Self defense, or the defense of another, has always been a legitimate defense to the crime of murder. When a soldier kills someone during a war, it is in the defense of others (one’s fellow soldiers or countrymen) or for self preservation. Thus, soldiers carrying out legitimate orders in the line of duty are not “murderers”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.