Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
No study has ever shown a 100% genetic explanation of differences. Usually they report that their study indicates that a trait has some % heritability factor. The following study showed that no single genetic difference could account for more than 0.4% of the difference in “g” (IQ).

Genome-wide quantitative trait locus association scan of general cognitive ability using pooled DNA and 500K single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays.Butcher LM, Davis OS, Craig IW, Plomin R.
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.

General cognitive ability (g), which refers to what cognitive abilities have in common, is an important target for molecular genetic research because multivariate quantitative genetic analyses have shown that the same set of genes affects diverse cognitive abilities as well as learning disabilities. In this first autosomal genome-wide association scan of g, we used a two-stage quantitative trait locus (QTL) design with pooled DNA to screen more than 500,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on microarrays, selecting from a sample of 7000 7-year-old children. In stage 1, we screened for allele frequency differences between groups pooled for low and high g. In stage 2, 47 SNPs nominated in stage 1 were tested by individually genotyping an independent sample of 3195 individuals, representative of the entire distribution of g scores in the full 7000 7-year-old children. Six SNPs yielded significant associations across the normal distribution of g, although only one SNP remained significant after a false discovery rate of 0.05 was imposed. However, none of these SNPs accounted for more than 0.4% of the variance of g, despite 95% power to detect associations of that size. It is likely that QTL effect sizes, even for highly heritable traits such as cognitive abilities and disabilities, are much smaller than previously assumed. Nonetheless, an aggregated ‘SNP set’ of the six SNPs correlated 0.11 (P < 0.00000003) with g. This shows that future SNP sets that will incorporate many more SNPs could be useful for predicting genetic risk and for investigating functional systems of effects from genes to brain to behavior.

84 posted on 07/07/2008 9:10:08 AM PDT by allmendream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
No study has ever shown a 100% genetic explanation for differences.

I've never known anyone who ever claimed there was a 100% genetic explanation. In contrast, I've encountered many people who claim IQ differences are 100% accounted for by "environment" or "culture". No doubt it's a mix of factors, with genetics being one. But then, culture and IQ are intertwined. For thousands of years, Europeans, East Asians, Sub-Saharan Africans, and the peoples of the New World lived in isolation from one another. They created different cultures, and the ones created by Europeans and East Asians pretty much correlate with their present performance on entrance exams and IQ tests.

86 posted on 07/07/2008 9:42:48 AM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson