I don't support gay rights. I support human rights. Some people happen to be homosexual. Unlike some knee jerkers here, I don't fight everything associated with homosexuals. I decide on the issue and take my stand in accordance with what I believe about it.
I am not asking the army to support homosexuals. I am asking the army to leave them alone unless they violated some standard of conduct. In this case, unwanted hitting on others or assaulting others. I believe the military already has those behaviors prohibited. To have a "don't tell" rule which includes being "found out" off base for what would otherwise be legal activity is ridiculous and at best unequal enforcement of the military code.
Umm, in order for the military to not “leave” them alone they must support sodomy in the first place.
Hint, sodomy nor adultery goes big with most military personnel. You see, people's BEHAVIOR not skin color or genitals must be JUDGED in the strict environment of an all VOLUNTEER military.
Yes they are homosexuals in the military, as well as adulterers, pedophiles, liars, thieves ect... What is your point besides forcing the acceptance of behaviors deemed sick and perverted by many military members? "Human rights"? I guess those who deem homosexuality morally reprehensible have no rights?
“Some people happen to be homosexual.”
That is the fault in your premise. They don’t just happen to be homosexual, they chose to be homosexual. If it weren’t a choice, then why does the gay community still fight for the ability to adopt? If their natural state precludes them from procreating, why would they still have a desire to become parents? Which course of action is their nature when they have a natural desire to become parents? Are they denying their nature by participating in activities that make it impossible to procreate or are they denying their nature when they want to parent?