Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasKate
I guess your definition of “intelligent designer” is quite different than mine. Sounds like the word “intelligent” is somewhat foreign to you.

If you are opening up science to non-scientific theories then where do you draw the line? Who decides which theory is worthy of classroom analysis and which are not? Why your 'intelligent designer' and not the Flying Spaghetti Monster or any of the other creation theories out there? When it comes to testing, one intelligent designer is no more testable than another.

89 posted on 07/09/2008 4:00:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Excuse me, but ID is just as scientific as the evolutionary theory. Not to mention that it makes a lot more sense then the “Big bang” theory.


90 posted on 07/09/2008 4:37:34 AM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson