You prove my argument. Evolution science is no different than ID. Neither one can be proved. I’d be more than happy to have ID removed from science class along with evolution. There is no “scientific proof” for either. BUT, if evolution is going to be taught in science class then there is no reason to exclude the ID theory along with it.
But science constantly tests evolution theory through new discoveries and new hypothesis, trying to find answers to the question that are still out there. ID does nothing but try to poke holes in evolution and then say, "See? Evolution is wrong so we must be right by default." Science doesn't work that way.
There is no “scientific proof” for either. BUT, if evolution is going to be taught in science class then there is no reason to exclude the ID theory along with it.
Before that shouldn't you try and identify the intelligent designer?