Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlurking
Does anyone in Florida know the basis for this claim?

From a Miami Herald article:

However, the bill states that property owned or leased by an employer who has a permit required by federal law to manufacture, use, store or move explosives would still be off limits. Disney has a permit for its fireworks shows.

The loophole was lobbied for by a group of lawyers that represented groups and businesses that included Disney, The Orlando Sentinel reports.

Shannon McAleavey, Disney World Vice President of Public Affairs, said in the memo that, with some exceptions, ``this law does not apply to Walt Disney World Co. owned and leased properties.''


19 posted on 07/08/2008 1:38:59 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
The loophole was lobbied for by a group of lawyers that represented groups and businesses that included Disney, The Orlando Sentinel reports.

Aha! The stealth exemption.

Had Disney tried for an clause that was clearly granting themselves an exemption, it would not have passed. But, they apparently realized they could sneak this one in. And they were right.

29 posted on 07/08/2008 1:57:33 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

However, the bill states that property owned or leased by an employer who has a permit required by federal law to manufacture, use, store or move explosives would still be off limits. Disney has a permit for its fireworks shows.


That’s not what the law says. An honest reporter wouldn’t paraphrase it to please the Disney lawyers. He would quote it.

“(6) exceptions.—the prohibitions in subsection (2) do not apply to:...
(d) property owned or leased by an employer or the landlord of an employer upon which the primary business conducted is the manufacture, use, storage, or transportation of combustible or explosive materials regulated under state or federal law.”

Disney is not in the fireworks making or warehousing business. This was intended to apply to oil refineries, fuel tank farms, and ammunition manufacturers.

Following Disney’s logic, any business with a can of gasoline or solvent would be exempt.


50 posted on 07/08/2008 3:08:59 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
However, the bill states that property owned or leased by an employer who has a permit required by federal law to manufacture, use, store or move explosives would still be off limits. Disney has a permit for its fireworks shows.

It's a dumb exception in first place, if the employees have access to real explosives, what's a gun or two going to matter when one of them loses his cabbage? (Except that no one will be able to shoot his sorry a$$ before he sets them off).

Secondly, Fireworks?

Give me a FReeping Break!

64 posted on 07/08/2008 4:43:37 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson