Skip to comments.
Dead Sea tablet 'casts doubt' on death and resurrection of Jesus
The Times of London ^
| July 9, 2008
| Sheera Frenkel
Posted on 07/09/2008 1:56:21 PM PDT by americanophile
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: americanophile
The only thing new here seems to be the citation for “three days.”
I don’t recall that being in the Old Testament.
Scholarly corrections on that point are welcome if I am mistaken.
To: americanophile
I’ll bet these are some of the same folks that stay up late nights figuring out how to “prove” the book of Isaiah was written hundreds of years after Isaiah was dead because it’s “clear that the author had prior knowledge of the events which it predicts, therefore, he must have written AFTER the events”.
For some people there is no such thing as circular reasoning as long as you are “disproving” something you don’t want to believe.
To: americanophile
Heh.
You've got to hand it to these reporters. They even solved the issue before Dan Brown came up with a new earth shattering novel..........
23
posted on
07/09/2008 2:10:09 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: ninergold3
Jesus was a “trouble maker.” He was a great Jew, but created a lot of problems between the Jewish sects and the Romans. If you want an example, he denigrated the money lenders at the Temple, chastising them for dealing with earthly affairs. The truth is that the money lenders facilitated Jews who came from different locations to pay for their sacrifices at the temple.
Additionlly. the communities at Qumran were waiting for the Messiah—but the name of Jesus of Nazarath is NEVER nemtioned.
Jesus was not the Messiah. (How about Menacham Schemsin?)
24
posted on
07/09/2008 2:10:39 PM PDT
by
gallaxyglue
(Have we lost our civilization as we know it?)
To: americanophile
Such reports shake what little faith I had - in journalists.
To: kjo
Agreed. I don’t see how it casts doubt either...
To: americanophile
27
posted on
07/09/2008 2:12:13 PM PDT
by
GOP Poet
To: americanophile
Somebody notify the Pope.
The house of cards has fallen.
:^P
28
posted on
07/09/2008 2:13:25 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Public policy should never become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. -- Ike Eisenhower)
To: americanophile
Does the tablet confirm the Da Vinci Code and the Gospel of Judas?
To: B-Chan
Damn, I need a new keyboard and monitor after I spit my soda when I read that! LOL
30
posted on
07/09/2008 2:14:15 PM PDT
by
Hatheos
To: Ron Jeremy
I am not quite sure what you're getting at but if the numerous books of the Bible prophecy of Jesus, why would one artifact cancel or be more important than those just because it's different.
31
posted on
07/09/2008 2:16:03 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: americanophile
I suppose that it is too much to ask that these “intellectual” critics to consider the obvious likelihood that the recorders of the New Testament merely recorded events as they happened — without following some trumped-up, mythical “model”...
32
posted on
07/09/2008 2:18:27 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: americanophile
Bull$#!t !!
33
posted on
07/09/2008 2:19:26 PM PDT
by
airborne
(End the "open primary" system now!!! Only Republicans should vote in Republican primaries!)
To: americanophile
Of course the prophecy was known; why was Pilate asked to put a guard at the tomb?
34
posted on
07/09/2008 2:21:57 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: zeestephen
Every few years we get articles proclaiming that Jesus' existence or his crucifixion and especially his resurrection have been
'called into question' by some artifact or other. The purported 'evidence' is usually some 'scholars' opinion on some illegible writing on something or other from the ancient world. Most are quickly exposed as a hoax, totally unsubstantiated or simply far too inconclusive to 'prove' anything (like this one) and quickly forgotten, except to the more active atheists prowling the internet who thrive on anything that helps them sustain their unbelief.
Much ado about very little, as usual.
35
posted on
07/09/2008 2:22:04 PM PDT
by
Jim Scott
(Time Heals)
To: americanophile
...the most controversial lines were indecipherable. So that makes it perfecty clear.
36
posted on
07/09/2008 2:23:24 PM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat lead.)
To: ninergold3
...even though it was written decades before the BIRTH of Jesus.... I think that sums it up, doesn't it?
37
posted on
07/09/2008 2:24:36 PM PDT
by
nikos1121
(The first black president of the US should be at least a "Jackie Robinson.")
To: normy
I am not quite sure what you're getting at but if the numerous books of the Bible prophecy of Jesus, why would one artifact cancel or be more important than those just because it's different. It wouldn't. First, I don't even think this artifact negates what is in the bible.. I think it supports it. But, let's say this artifact does run counter to the bible. I would consider it as relavent in an overall analysis. You seem to have th attitude that you will ignore anything and everything that doesn't fit to a pre-conceived view.. well, that is what I thought you were saying.. perhaps I misinterpreted what you were saying. carry on.
38
posted on
07/09/2008 2:25:28 PM PDT
by
Ron Jeremy
(sonic)
To: B-Chan
39
posted on
07/09/2008 2:26:44 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: americanophile
It was only found years ago. Sigh... let me dig through discs to find the stuff from the biblioarchs.
40
posted on
07/09/2008 2:26:54 PM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(If you don't love this country, tear up your passport, leave and live under a dictator.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson