Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan

This’ll come up in the A32, but the agents did not immediately identify themselves as NCIS. Whenever they did, though, Weemer should have stopped.

NCIS agents did play the “recall” card though throughout the investigation. If an inactive Marine refused to talk, agents would say they could get him recalled for active duty. A nasty trick that isn’t true. NCIS agents don’t have that power. But it was an effective means of coercion.


19 posted on 07/10/2008 9:51:47 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: RedRover
I hope all that comes up in court. Coercion, threats, and misrepresenting statements (notice how Fox had recorders for Weemer & Nelson but just recollections on an affidavit for Nazario?) - including changing or adding to signed statements are well worn tools of the trade for Winter's Wankers.

I remember the 1st case I had heard of, one of the Hamandia cases, where 3 Marines swore NCIS changed their signed affidavits. I came in when prosecutor Piggot suddenly decided that he was a witness as well as a prosecutor - I don't remember who he had supposedly witnessed making a statement to NCIS or wtf business of his it would have been to be present for an interrogation, I just remember my jaw dropping at the absurdity of the situation.

That sort of crap has just gotten expotentially deeper since.

I think refusing to cooperate is going to be a growing trend unless the Marine Corps changes direction and stop offering up Marines to placate Iraqi and Democrat politicians.

20 posted on 07/10/2008 10:39:27 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (DefendOurMarines.org Defend Our Troops.org Free Evan Vela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson