Well, maybe...but I’m thinking that, if it isn’t entirely contrived for the purpose (which requires pretzel logic), the likelier scenario is that B. Hussein was given a script and mangled it, thus locking the wrong position into the public record, something that they’ll all have to ‘revise and extend’ somewhere down the road. The comment sounded like he was disgusted with an incompetent or perhaps angry at a predator. Now, which of these do you prefer?
By the way, why are we all still giving JJ the clerical title? Where’s his congretation? What church is he serving? Who ordained him? This ‘reverend’ thing is insulting to actual ministers, especially when the ‘reverend’ in question is entirely without portfolio or even piety or faith. Until I see proof that JJ actually works as a man of God in an actual church, I refuse to allow him the label of ‘reverend’.