Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFPhys
I agree with your #1 and 2. But on 13, I'm always skeptical of old maps and their level of detail. The current lack of ice along Greenland is sufficient for that part of the passage anyway, it's the part above Canada that will be tricky (impossible so far this year).

I would also note that this year's ice looks more challenging to a passage than last year's http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=07&fd=10&fy=2007&sm=07&sd=10&sy=2008

27 posted on 07/11/2008 8:41:23 AM PDT by palmer (Tag lines are an extra $1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

Here is the map that is so fascinating to me. Image that you are drawing this map with respect to magnetic north. All of that white area at the top is open water above Siberia and Canada. There is a whole load of Canada's northern coast, as well as Russia's. That area has been virtually ice locked since Magellan, but apparently not while Polo was sailing. Below is a polar projection map - I wish I could have found a better one for comparison here. Clearly, the map above does not show the full extent of Polo's explorations in the north (or the south, either). In fact, he would not have "seen the pole star in the south" unless he got nearly to Greenland's coast.

Recall that his voyages were a mere hundred years or so after the warmest two centuries of the last 2000yrs - it is likely to have been as much as 3F warmer in 1000AD in the north pole area as it is even now. A fairly ice-free Arctic Ocean should not be surprising.


28 posted on 07/11/2008 9:54:41 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson