Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain’s Conservative Model? Roosevelt (Theodore, That Is)
NY Times ^ | July 13, 2008 | ADAM NAGOURNEY and MICHAEL COOPER

Posted on 07/12/2008 12:24:50 PM PDT by flyfree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: flyfree

your first quote doesn’t make teddy out to be a property rights guy!

“...holds his property subject to the general right of the community to regulate its use...”

uh duh!


41 posted on 07/12/2008 12:59:02 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

And you think those quotes support him? LOL.


42 posted on 07/12/2008 1:01:15 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ken21
But the whole quote begins: “The man who wrongly holds that every human right is secondary to his profit ...” which is true. Profit is not above every other human right (no matter how much of a big business guy you are)
43 posted on 07/12/2008 1:01:55 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

They show he wasn’t a fascist. Fascists don’t believe in human rights trumping profit or government.


44 posted on 07/12/2008 1:02:47 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ken21
I'm in the middle of reading that book. It gives quite different perspective on history than we're used to hearing, a lot like Coulter's "Treason".

The libs love to call W a fascist, but I don't see him throwing anyone in jail for saying it, or shutting down newspapers, like lib icons Wilson and FDR did.

45 posted on 07/12/2008 1:02:47 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: FlyVet

you are my 20,000th reply!

you are right; it is a different perspective as some of the remarks above show.

quite frankly, after reading goldberg’s book i kicked myself for not reading up on the progressive era before.

many democrats and republicans wanted to ditch the u.s. constitution.


47 posted on 07/12/2008 1:08:03 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: richace

my favorite of the sixties—bob dylan.

saw him when i was in the u.s. navy february 12, 1966 live.

he was stoned.


48 posted on 07/12/2008 1:10:03 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: flyfree
Great. McCain models himself after the "Republican" who gave us the 16th and 17th Amendments.

And that's better than Karl Marx how?

49 posted on 07/12/2008 1:17:40 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
many democrats and republicans wanted to ditch the u.s. constitution.

As much as they ignore it now, nothing has changed.

It's as close to a "must read" as I would recommend. The parallels are scary. You can see the demagoguery of the left in the energy crisis: create the problem with corrupt policy, blame someone else, and "vote for me, the god that will save you from all your problems."

"Yay! Yay!" say the Ignorant Masses.

It's sickening, disgusting, and transparent.

One bright spot: the Ignorant Masses are giving the Clown Show a 9% approval rating. There is still hope.

50 posted on 07/12/2008 1:23:59 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: flyfree; ken21
Profit is not above every other human right (no matter how much of a big business guy you are)

Sure it is. When people like TR say this, what they mean is things like "Exxon shouldn't make so much profit, they should give some back in the form of a tax". "Insurance companies shouldn't make so much profit, they should be forced to cover X, Y, and Z". Or, "Banks shouldn't make so much profit, they should be forced to lend in their communities".

51 posted on 07/12/2008 1:25:05 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Obama is more in the mold of Carter than FDR.


52 posted on 07/12/2008 1:36:39 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Theodore Roosevelt pretty much defined the Progressive Era of US History.

He was proud to call himself a “progressive”. It’s ridiculous to argue otherwise. The name of TR’s party in the 1912 election was the 1912 PROGRESSIVE PARTY.

According to Wikipedia, “Its platform called for women’s suffrage, recall of judicial decisions, easier amendment of the U.S. Constitution, social welfare legislation for women and children, workers’ compensation, limited injunctions in strikes, farm relief, revision of banking to assure an elastic currency, required health insurance in industry, new inheritance taxes and income taxes, improvement of inland waterways, and limitation of naval armaments.”

TR favored big government, Federal bureaucratic intrusion, imperial expansion, and big labor, while opposing private enterprise.

As a result, high school and college instructors probably loved him. Evidently he is still viewed favorably by modern conservatives of the “national greatness” variety.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_%28United_States%2C_1912%29


53 posted on 07/12/2008 1:36:45 PM PDT by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Theodore Roosevelt pretty much defined the Progressive Era of US History.

He was proud to call himself a “progressive”. It’s ridiculous to argue otherwise. The name of TR’s party in the 1912 election was the 1912 PROGRESSIVE PARTY.

According to Wikipedia, “Its platform called for women’s suffrage, recall of judicial decisions, easier amendment of the U.S. Constitution, social welfare legislation for women and children, workers’ compensation, limited injunctions in strikes, farm relief, revision of banking to assure an elastic currency, required health insurance in industry, new inheritance taxes and income taxes, improvement of inland waterways, and limitation of naval armaments.”

TR favored big government, Federal bureaucratic intrusion, imperial expansion, and big labor, while opposing private enterprise.

As a result, high school and college instructors love him. Evidently he is still viewed favorably by modern conservatives of the “national greatness” variety.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_%28United_States%2C_1912%29


54 posted on 07/12/2008 1:39:58 PM PDT by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Got it.... When I think of the true definition of fascist Mussolini is the best example that comes to mind.. he fits the dictionary definition of fascist...

with the term theoretical/economic fascist I still don’t see where that term applies here...

because TR’s control of the government or the economy was not absolute...

He did have a weak congress and other politicians at the time that he ran rough shod over, but by no means do I think it rises to the level of fascism...

but then again the dictionary definition of Racism could be wrong..

Main Entry: fas·cism Pronunciation: \ˈfa-ËŒshi-zÉ™m also ˈfa-ËŒsi-\ Function: noun Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces Date: 1921 1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control


55 posted on 07/12/2008 1:44:04 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RBroadfoot; nicollo
Teddy wasn't quite the same guy in 1912 that he had been in 1901 or 1902.

Maybe that's another first for him. Lately, retired politicians take off to New York where they get refashioned by the intelligentsia into a much more liberal pattern.

That certainly happened with Teddy, though I can't think of any earlier politicians who went that route.

56 posted on 07/12/2008 1:44:26 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ken21
do you have historical context for you statements that FDR admired Hitler an Mussolini... or is that supposition on your part from what what you know of the man.
57 posted on 07/12/2008 1:46:55 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RBroadfoot
ah wikipedia.... the self editorializing, self publishing encyclopedia of the Internet... that first resort of the quick hit artist... (sorry I do not hold wikipedia’s info in high regard...)

. To much of the information on the site is corrupted or not vetted throughly and like any other source should not be taken as cold hard fact unless you have several other INDEPENDENT sources that back up the facts... just sayin...

58 posted on 07/12/2008 1:55:51 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RBroadfoot
ah wikipedia.... the self editorializing, self publishing encyclopedia of the Internet... that first resort of the quick hit artist... (sorry I do not hold wikipedia’s info in high regard...)

. To much of the information on the site is corrupted or not vetted throughly and like any other source should not be taken as cold hard fact unless you have several other INDEPENDENT sources that back up the facts... just sayin...

59 posted on 07/12/2008 1:55:53 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolf
with the term theoretical/economic fascist I still don’t see where that term applies here... because TR’s control of the government or the economy was not absolute...

Your point is well taken, but I would assert that the early activities of the Progressives were the first steps of the fascist movement... brought to its logical conclusion by Mussolini.

60 posted on 07/12/2008 1:59:32 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson