Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

I hear ya, but you’re working with the presumption that Bush would be on point. He won’t be, it will be Isarael. We already have assets in theater, approved by congress mind you, to deal with immediate threats that may....let’s say...pop up.

I think it’ll be a little later than sooner, but things being pushed out too far is a bit risky (politically). I don’t think Bush gambles lol. A more stable ‘area’ would immediately send oil prices down...with a little Saudi help as well, I would think. It’s interesting for sure, because there’s strong calculated risks regarding timing...both ways.

And back to congress...the way I figure it’ll go down, congress won’t even need to call a meeting... All just guesses here.


55 posted on 07/13/2008 12:58:04 AM PDT by jedward (tag _________________________)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: jedward
I can't argue with that,,,

Maybe I tend to think of this like what I would do,,,but,,,

I keep goin’ back to the mods on the B-2s to carry the

M.O.P.s,,,

I keep goin’ back to the fact that Israel cannot carry the

bomb load to deliver the knock-out blow to 100? nuke sites,

And keep the Straits of Hormuz open,,,

This is all a big >IF< of course...

56 posted on 07/13/2008 1:51:02 AM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson