Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glock rocks
Pitch demand inelasticity in there and you've got the model.
139 posted on 07/14/2008 6:02:02 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (God gave us Law a fool can follow, and a genius can't comprehend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie; autumnraine; B4Ranch
"Congressional attacks on speculation do not alter the oil market's fundamental demand and supply conditions. What would lower the long-term price of oil is for Congress to permit exploration for the estimated billions upon billions of barrels of oil domestically available, not to mention the estimated trillion-plus barrels of shale oil in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. Some politicians pooh-pooh calls for drilling, saying it would take five or 10 years to recover the oil.

I guarantee you we would begin to see a reduction in today's prices even if it took five to 10 years for us to get the first barrel. Put yourself in the place of an OPEC member knowing there would be a greater supply of U.S. oil five or 10 years, hence maybe driving oil prices lower to say $40 a barrel. What will you want to do now while oil is $130 a barrel? You would want to sell as much oil now and OPEC's collective efforts to do so would put downward pressures on current oil prices. Right now the U.S. Congress is OPEC's staunchest ally."

-- Walter Williams

196 posted on 07/14/2008 6:00:39 PM PDT by glock rocks (Baraq Hussein Obama ~ black, white, and red all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson