Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You are correct: a heat-seeking missile would indeed aim for the engines.

But the combined engine wash from a 747 is titanically different from the wash of (say) an F15, a MIG or any of the usual design targets of a AA missile. A 747 wash will easily throw cars around. I can certainly imagine a missile striking the 'wrong' part of a plane if it engaged the wash.

72 posted on 07/18/2008 7:11:44 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra
But the combined engine wash from a 747 is titanically different from the wash of (say) an F15, a MIG or any of the usual design targets of a AA missile. A 747 wash will easily throw cars around. I can certainly imagine a missile striking the 'wrong' part of a plane if it engaged the wash.

I sometimes have a problem keeping all the missile theories straight, but I don't remember any that identify exactly where the missile was supposed to have hit. Any such place would have shown evidence of an explosion. I know that none of the engines showed damage, what part of the airlplane did?

77 posted on 07/18/2008 7:17:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson