Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
If there was explosive residue found anywhere on the remains then that would clinch it, I guess.

I should explain: I don't know if there was explosive residue found/covered up/discovered by sniffer dog which was later murdered by Bill Clinton - or not.

I don't know if the plane actually suffered an explosion in the fuel-tank area, or if it folded up like an accordion after losing both wings.

I'm just challenging this "heat-seekers must hit the engine" idea, which I believe to be a chimera.

83 posted on 07/18/2008 7:27:43 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra
I'm just challenging this "heat-seekers must hit the engine" idea, which I believe to be a chimera.

But to me at least it makes sense that it would. From miles away, the engines are the biggest heat source the airplane was putting out. That's what the missile seeker would have locked on to and tracked to. And I suggest the lack of any evidence of an explosion, either on the engine or outside the center fuel tank, also is an indication that a missile wasn't the cause.

87 posted on 07/18/2008 7:36:46 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson