Skip to comments.
NYT REJECTS MCCAIN'S EDITORIAL; SHOULD 'MIRROR' OBAMA
Drudge ^
| Mon Jul 21 2008
| Drudge
Posted on 07/21/2008 9:09:19 AM PDT by edzo4
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: Osage Orange
No doubt about that, though until election 2008 they’ve been Mccain cheerleaders.
To: edzo4
I find it ironic that he is emulating the worst mistake of the Bush administration by waving the Mission Accomplished banner prematurely. UNNECESSARY & OUTRAGEOUS.
22
posted on
07/21/2008 9:19:28 AM PDT
by
anita
To: All
Could we get this in front page news somehow? It is blaring on the front page of Drudge, after all.
23
posted on
07/21/2008 9:19:42 AM PDT
by
kc8ukw
To: edzo4
I think the Barack Hussein Obama editorial should be seen as a corporate campaign contribution to his campaign.
24
posted on
07/21/2008 9:21:59 AM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: edzo4
Freedom of the press, Ha! That is a myth propagated by the lords and ladyships in Versailles/Washington. It is NOT for common people or for “enemies of the state”.
Just try writing a letter to the editor, espousing Conservative values. Three things happen: 1) it doesn't get published; 2) you don't recognize what is published, or 3)they round up some Neanthredal with DNC talking points to rebut you the day yours gets published.
25
posted on
07/21/2008 9:22:00 AM PDT
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
To: edzo4
Good now more people will see it...
Exactly. The New York Times is less relevant everyday. And Drudge is incredibly popular, and loves a scoop.
26
posted on
07/21/2008 9:22:21 AM PDT
by
kc8ukw
To: neutrality
The NY Times view is a lie. Please don’t tell me you believe it.
To: edzo4
28
posted on
07/21/2008 9:23:08 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: edzo4
Ya’ know there is a parallel here.
In Iraq, Zawqari cut off the heads of captured Islamic sympathizers as well as others.
Are you paying attention, Senator?
To: edzo4
The N.Y. Times better hope McCain doesn't win. I think he holds grudges.
We may see tanks rolling through Times Square this time.
30
posted on
07/21/2008 9:23:35 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Either way we're screwed but I'm still voting for McCain)
To: kc8ukw
You can do it yourself. Type “frontpage” into “topics” list.
And, BTW, I agree with you.
31
posted on
07/21/2008 9:23:48 AM PDT
by
CedarDave
("Not Evil, Just Wrong - The True Cost of Global Warming Hysteria" http://noteviljustwrong.com/)
To: kc8ukw
Rush mentioned it in the first few minutes...it's out now. Stay tuned.
Rush says that the Drive-Bys are like parents escorting Little Barry on his first trip to summer camp while saving the world at the same time...going overseas on someone elses money...trying to learn something. RUSH: This trip is pimping George Bush's ride.
32
posted on
07/21/2008 9:23:52 AM PDT
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: edzo4
The NY Times is talking to McCain like a teacher would speak to a student. Rewrite it and we look at it again and decide whether to publish it. So juvenile.
33
posted on
07/21/2008 9:24:12 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: KC_Conspirator
I’m inclined to believe their anti-Mccain bias affected the decision, but it’s probably not a complete fabrication. Mccain has written plenty of NYT editorials, at least one even this year.
To: edzo4
Why does the NYT even PRETEND to be an unbiased journalistic paper??? Come on now.
Why don't they just be honest and rename it the "DEMOCRATIC PARTY TIMES"???
After all, the DPT is blatantly biased on a regular basis.
That blatant bias was highlighted by the absolutely OUTRAGEOUS "HIT PIECE" on McCain with that female lobbyist a few months ago. That "hit piece" was so unconcionable and shameful that even many liberals (even Gueraldo Rivera winced for one) were embarrassed by it.
That that shameful, disguting and outrageous bias was 'child's play' compared to this blatant censorship and partisanship.
Shameful and UNCONSCIONABLE!!
35
posted on
07/21/2008 9:24:51 AM PDT
by
stockstrader
(CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
To: neutrality
Scratch that, I may have imagined the part about Mccain previously writing NYT editorials
To: KC_Conspirator
Mccain is no idiot. His campaign knew it would be rejected and that’s why they chose the NYT. His editorial would get
a barn storm of attention if rejected versus just putting it
in a paper that would print it.
I liked the part where he ties Obama to Bush failures of waving the mission accomplished flag to early.
To: neutrality
Well, then I have some bridges to sell you.
To: edzo4
Why is this a surprise? The Slimes long ago stopped even pretending to be objective.
39
posted on
07/21/2008 9:26:23 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(The problem with the rat race is,even if you win you're still a rat.)
To: nutmeg
40
posted on
07/21/2008 9:27:14 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Imagine Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama... appointing US Supreme Court justices)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson