Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neutrality
That’s perfectly fine, I’m just saying the way they see it editorials are supposed to be a bit more substantive.

No that's not it. It's that they are in the tank for Obama.

56 posted on 07/21/2008 9:36:38 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, youÂ’ve got it made." Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

They are no doubt in tank for Obama and every democrat, but that doesn’t necessarily mean this was an acceptable editorial.


57 posted on 07/21/2008 9:38:22 AM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan; neutrality

The Obama piece was wholy unsubstantive, and it would surprise me if someone who read it would try to defend the NY Times as if they had a rational basis for their decision.


160 posted on 07/21/2008 11:56:12 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson