Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

I have always wondered why NATO was expanded in 1990 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

It should have been pared-down to 3 countries - UK, US, and Germany.

We share common culture, etc... with Europe, but now NATO is 30 members and we have no common enemy (or at least that is how the EU feels). We can’t even coordinate NATO in Afghanistan.

What is the point of maintaining the fiction?


14 posted on 07/22/2008 10:02:35 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88
What is the point of maintaining the fiction?

I would love an explanation too. All we usually get from Washington is some empty sentence about "supporting our allies."
17 posted on 07/22/2008 10:10:07 AM PDT by kc8ukw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88
I have always wondered why NATO was expanded in 1990 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

NATO, as a worthwhile organization, lost any effective meaning with the collapse of first, the Warsaw Pact and then the collapse of the Soviet Union itself. The real question should have been "Why didn't NATO disband in 1990, after the collapse of the Soviet Union?"

the infowarrior

30 posted on 07/22/2008 4:47:05 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson