Posted on 07/22/2008 10:22:26 AM PDT by Scythian
So, 48% have voted that the New York Times act appropriately in rejecting Sen. John McCain's op-ed piece? Amazing. If the "dems" get the White House, for sure silencing the right's voice is top of the list.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
It is really BAD for the NY Times if 52% side with McCain in a CNN online poll. That probably translates into about 70% of the public sides with McCain.
Put little value into online polls it is so easy to slam them. Probably 2 little KOS kiddies running vote bots.
Is this one of those call-in, e-mail in polls that they broadcast from time to time. If it is, it’s totally worthless.
Of course 37% of those polled did not the NY Times was a newspaper.
Like campaign finance reform...
It’s on thier site, they always have a poll on thier home page, here’s an example:
Did John McCain shoot babies in Vietnam?
1) Yes
2) Unsure
I’d be willing to bet that most of the morons who were questioned and who answered that the Slimes acted appropriately are the same people that Sean Hannity interviews on his “Man on the Street” Thursday sessions.
A bunch of dumb sh**t losers who are knee-jerk liberals but who know nothing of history or politics.
Democrat version of free speech = I’m allowed to spew whatever biased anti-america hate I want 24/7, but your only allowed to say something as long as I don’t disagree with it or it doesn’t hurt my feelings.
CNN is still broadcasting?
Who knew?
Who watches CNN!???? Come on now! Get a life///
cnn polling their newsroom again.
#2 should be changed to “probably”, then it would be more accurate.
Hey, I’d probably say they acted appropriately too. It’s their paper and they can run what they want to. I don’t want to see any private sector media be forced to run anything they don’t want to for whatever reason. So what...it clearly shows the NY Times is in the tank for Obama. Not only is that their choice but it presents a clear demonstration for even the dumbest of metrosexuals.
There are two candidates for president? How come nobody told me?
If the NYT's position the can't even get a majority in a CNN or MSNBC poll, it's bound to be unpopular in an unbiased survey.
There was a CNN online poll yesterday showing 48% preferred McCain's position on the Iraq war. It's pretty pathetic for Obama if he can't win a CNN poll with a 2:1 or 3:1 margin.
Oh hell, like everybody doesn’t know that all of CNNs polls are all rigged for the Left.
Their polls are absolutely worthless, unless you want to know what the Leftie “stuffers” want you to think.
oh for pity’s sake, it’s a CNN poll.
Thats what I was thinking too. If liberal CNN doesn't get over 80% response to the liberal side of a poll question, then it's a lost issue for them. And most people know it.
Shame on CNN !
In France it’s the only US TV chanel i can watch...I wonder how that bunch of useless whinning liberals can be called JOURNALISTS.
I asked them that question on their website and also another one on “liberal-fascism”...
“it’s a lost issue for them”....
I agree and they will drop it like a hot potato.....
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/
By Jonathan Martin 01:18 PM
McCain camp targets media love for Obama.
(GREAT VIDEO)
July 22, 2008
Categories: McCain
McCain camp targets media love for Obama
The McCain campaign is picking up where Saturday Night Live left off: Guilting reporters for purportedly being soft on Barack Obama.
Theyve begun a contest on their website under the headline: The Media is in LOVE with Barack
Pick the best song for their devotion, they ask readers, offering the same compilation video of TV news clips gushing over the Democratic candidate set to two different love ballads.
Asked why they are engaging in media-bashing, McCain spokesman Brian Rogers replied: Love for The One is in the air.
McCain aides have begun to poke fun at Obamas rock-star image by referring to him with the faux lofty phrase.
NBC and MSNBC come in for special criticism in the video, with Chris Matthews taking the brunt of the attack.
Hes sorta a gift from the world to us in so many ways, Matthews is shown saying three times in a row.
While McCain aides have grumbled for months about treatment of Obama, this is the most outward effort to tweak the media and perhaps evoke a little guilt.
To that end, "Madam Speaker Pelosi" is working aggressively behind the scenes to re-introduce the "Fairness Doctrine" and to gain control over the Internet to silence those of us who simply refuse to swallow her kool-aid.
The one I saw was "Did John McCain drop napalm on babies in Vietnam?"
Not surprised given the one-sidedness of the emailers to Jack Cafferty.
Wow! 48% of brain-damaged Leftists agree that the NYT acted properly!
Its from CNN... Need I say anymore?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.