Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
IIRC, Churchill's sacking came about because of the Dardanelles debacle. He was the scapegoat there, the real fault lie with the commanders on the scene, but that's another discussion.

As for Coventry, I recently read that the story of Churchill knowing Coventry was a target but deliberately didn't warn the city is a myth. All the British knew in advance was that there would be a raid that day, but they didn't know the target. Can't recall where I read that, unfortunately.

74 posted on 07/23/2008 1:47:23 PM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: jalisco555
You are correct on both points. The myth that Churchill sacrificed Coventry to keep the Ultra decryption secret was (I think) first brought up in the book Intrepid. The British historian and politician Nigel West (real name Rupert Allason) has debunked the story in one of his books. (I think it was Counterfeit Spies, but like you I am not quite sure.)
91 posted on 07/23/2008 2:02:28 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson