Posted on 07/24/2008 10:22:35 AM PDT by jazusamo
Ping!
GW high priests and their acolytes are sounding like Y2K doom and gloomers on 1/2/2000.
Actually, before the Monckton paper, there was another one that stated that there was no doubt about GW. Further, the Physics and Society publication put a giant red disclamer before the Monckton article stating they didn’t agree with it and that it had not been peer reviewed.
Monckton responded with a letter to the publication pointing out all of the review the paper had, in fact, undergone.
Reading all of this is instructive. The polemics in the paper prior to Monckton’s in the publication should be an eye opener to a lot of people.
And the consensus folks are "Solar Deniers".
Thought you might enjoy this thread
I think it’s interesting that the global warming crowd has changed their rant to climate change for the most part.
The primary evidence, the essential necessary evidence, that the greenhouse effect, and by extension CO2, is causing global warming doesn't exist. If the planet is warming this is proof positive that it isn't because of the greenhouse effect.
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
This is a short and easily understandable article showing the plain truth. The hinge pin that links global temperature to the greenhouse effect is missing. It is easily measurable and hundreds of probes have done so.
Written by the man who "DEVOTED six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office."
Thanks for linking that, it’s a good article.
read later
My pleasure. That is the end of this “greenhouse” BS. It just needs wider exposure and expansion on the theme.
Science is about facts. There are many pseudo-scientists today who have already formed their conclusions and use a few idiotic experiments to “prove” their ideas.
IMHO, science ceased to be a science and relegated itself back to an art way back in the 60’s and 70’s. It has joined my own academic discipline (psychology) which still acknowledges that it is merely an art.
Science is proven/proveable. Art is more about opinion/best guesses based on incomplete evidence.
There is a more subtle point about science to keep in mind. Science is always and only at the edge of human understanding. We do experiments on things we DON’T understand. That’s why you do an experiment in the first place.
That is also why so many scientists are reluctant to draw conclusions, even from a large body of data. The methods can create false conclusions. The data may not be accurate. The analysis of the results may be focusing on the wrong aspect of some phenomena.
In the fullness of time, I trust, Al Gore’s megalomaniacal arrogance will become crystal clear to historians and future scientists. A cautionary tale for all to consider at length.
Al Gore, the divinity college drop out, has spoken with all the credibility of a televangelist. Send him all your money in forgiveness for destroying our planet. You didn’t think you were seen throwing that CFC bulb in a dumpster, did you?
By the way, you can get extra carbon credits at a reduced rate by sending him your first born child. They will be trained in the “science” of global warming, global cooling or whatever the current crisis fad may be.
My tagline usta be "Men defend most violently not the things they know to true, but those they fear are false."
The early FLDS threads prove it happens at FR too.
Signed: Balding_Eagle, Founding member of the Rapists of FR
I got that name from questionig the Constitutionally of the the raids.
I thought Dennis Miller was brilliant last night on O’Reilly. When asked about Big Al he said he didn’t think that Al believed any of the stuff he was selling, but he was making a lot of money(last count $1-300,000,000) and getting a lot of love everywhere he went and was loving it.
ping for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.