Criminal defendants are convicted on the basis of jailhouse snitches all the time. Pretty tough to pin this on Condit, though, without more evidence.Police can trace money, calendars, phone records, computer hard drives etc, but it’s now seven years later. I always believed that Condit got rid of this naive young woman. But,there has to be actual evidence linking him to the crime.
Yes,that's true.But in a case of this magnitude the "snitch" in question has an even stronger than usual motive to lie.Actually,maybe a couple of motives (fame and a deal from the prosecutor).Sure,investigators would be smart to try to confirm...or shoot down...his claim.If they can confirm it then obviously this proof is presented in court.