Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Group: Where Are Feminists on Sex-Selection Abortion Problem?
Life News ^ | 7/24/08 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/24/2008 3:58:16 PM PDT by wagglebee


Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A leading pro-life group that monitors international issues says the problem of sex-selection abortions could be lessened if pro-abortion activists got involved. But the Population Research Institute says the blather of protecting women and their health appears to stop at the border's edge.

In a new YouTube video the group has released, PRI president Steven Mosher decries the practice, common in East and South Asian countries, of sex-selective abortion.

"In China, India, and other Asian countries, there is a strong preference for boys," Mosher told LifeNews.com. "This combination of a preference for boys and modern technology--the ultrasound machine--has proven deadly for millions upon millions of baby girls."

He says figures from the United Nations show this practice has already claimed the lives of over 100 million girls worldwide.

The video goes on to cite a recent study published by the National Academy of Sciences, saying that many American groups, particularly those of Asian descent, have the same skewed birthrates as found in their country of origin.

Many of the sexist customs and practices that have led to these skewed birthrates are being imported into the United States, Mosher laments, and he says abortion activists should join pro-life advocates in speaking against them.

"Where are the feminists when you need them?" asks Mosher.

Mosher told LifeNews.com he doesn't understand why the widespread slaughter of unborn girls in sex-selection abortions has failed to raise concerns in the feminist community.

American feminists are so wedded to abortion-on-demand that they are unwilling to oppose any abortion, however egregious, Mosher contends. This is true, he says, even when the practice involves the killing of hundreds of millions of girls for the sole reason that they are girls.

"I challenge the National Organization of Women and other feminist groups, to join us in the battle to ban this terrible form of sex discrimination that is killing so many unborn baby girls. Their continued silence only facilitates the killing," he said.

Related web sites:
Population Research Institute - http://www.pop.org
PRI's New Video - http://www.youtube.com/colinpri1



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; feminists; moralabsolutes; prolife; sexselection
"I challenge the National Organization of Women and other feminist groups, to join us in the battle to ban this terrible form of sex discrimination that is killing so many unborn baby girls. Their continued silence only facilitates the killing," he said.

They care far more about infanticide than they do about women.

1 posted on 07/24/2008 3:58:17 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 07/24/2008 4:01:34 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 07/24/2008 4:02:01 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Photobucket
4 posted on 07/24/2008 4:11:56 PM PDT by xuberalles (The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties On The Net! http://www.cafepress.com/titillatingtees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m still curious as to how it will all shake out if a “gay gene” is ever said to be found, and parents can “choose” to kill the unborn child that has a “gay gene”. There have been and will be quite a few “irresistable force meets immoveable object” clashing liberal principles. We saw one example in this primary, women vs blacks. But they’re so good at being hypocritical, they’ll find a way to reconcile it. Or even more likely, we’ll start getting a clearer view of just what their true agenda is, by the side they come down on. Hmm, their endorsement of aberrant lifestyles, as opposed to their support of a death culture (abortion, euthanasia).


5 posted on 07/24/2008 4:14:36 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
100 million girls
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A terrible and revolting holocaust!

6 posted on 07/24/2008 4:16:03 PM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
I’m still curious as to how it will all shake out if a “gay gene” is ever said to be found, and parents can “choose” to kill the unborn child that has a “gay gene”.

If there were a "homosexual gene" and I sincerely doubt there is, they would make it a "hate crime" to test for it.

7 posted on 07/24/2008 4:19:10 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
...ban this terrible form of sex discrimination that is killing so many unborn baby girls...

Why don't feminists complain about sex-selection abortions? Two reasons:

First, the feminists would have to admit they're babies, not just masses of unformed tissue. Then, they'd have to explain how aborting female babies is somehow worse than aborting males. I'd say they were on shaky moral ground with both arguments.

8 posted on 07/24/2008 4:56:38 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Why don't feminists complain about sex-selection abortions? Two reasons:

First, the feminists would have to admit they're babies, not just masses of unformed tissue. Then, they'd have to explain how aborting female babies is somehow worse than aborting males. I'd say they were on shaky moral ground with both arguments.

You nailed it!

9 posted on 07/24/2008 4:58:09 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

You’re right, that option didn’t occur to me.


10 posted on 07/24/2008 5:08:28 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The solution would be to lie and state you were aborting a girl, not a gay male.


11 posted on 07/24/2008 5:14:19 PM PDT by tbw2 (Freeper sci-fi - "Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


12 posted on 07/25/2008 4:09:24 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson