Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/24/2008 7:50:26 PM PDT by Coffee200am
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coffee200am

If these hypocrites truly believed there are too many people in industrialized nations, they’d go off themselves.

I’ve got the gun and the bullet for them. I’ll pick up the tab.


2 posted on 07/24/2008 7:52:40 PM PDT by henkster (Politics is the art of telling a bigger and more believable lie more often than your opponent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

I don’t believe in birth control any more. Have as many kids as the Lord will bless you with.


3 posted on 07/24/2008 7:53:30 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

“raised the question of whether people in the UK should be told that stopping at two children is “the simplest and biggest contribution” that can be made to saving the planet.”

Civilized nations can reduce their population to make room for the turd world who likes to multiply starvation and disease along with barbarism. What a stupid idea.

Yeah sure. I propose exactly the opposite.


4 posted on 07/24/2008 7:55:14 PM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
One small problem, Grasshopper

Cleaner skies explain surprise rate of warming
09 July 2008
From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19926634.800-cleaner-skies-explain-surprise-rate-of-warming.html?feedId=online-news_rss20

6 posted on 07/24/2008 8:00:06 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Barack Obama is lika a bowl of chili - - he's full of beans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
How appropriate. I just wrote an article about population control and the left...

Cheers!

7 posted on 07/24/2008 8:00:09 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19926634.800-cleaner-skies-explain-surprise-rate-of-warming.html?feedId=online-news_rss20

Ooops.Missing link.


8 posted on 07/24/2008 8:00:45 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Barack Obama is lika a bowl of chili - - he's full of beans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

How bout we start by limiting all politicians and government bureaucrats to one child per family first. Let’s see how it works out with them first. Give it 20 years. Damn the results, we care - give us points for that, our INTENTIONS are good.

Further, lets force all politicians and government bureaucrats to take public transportation, carpool with at least 2 other people, walk, or use bicycles.

Take all the air conditioning out of all governemt office buildings. Give them a small desk fan.

Force all govt buildings in the winter to keep heat no higher than 65 degrees. No personal space heaters. Require them to bulk up on clothes like the average person will be doing.

Per Cheryl Crowe, set all toilet paper dispensers in government buildings to dispense only 1 square of toilet paper per visit.

Force all govt offices to us CFL and tube flourescent bulbs. If one breaks, call hazmat.

I have so f@cking had it with these Big Brother , pointy-headed elitist numb nuts thinking they can force US to do things we don’t want to do while themselves, they can keep wasting more and more and never having to change their behaviors.

LEAD BY EXAMPLE you political bastards! You start feeling the pain first, see how you damn like it.


9 posted on 07/24/2008 8:01:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
And in an editorial in the British Medical Journal they raised the question of whether people in the UK should be told that stopping at two children is "the simplest and biggest contribution" that can be made to saving the planet.

Last time I looked, the Brits are not reproducing at the replacement rate. They are averaging less than 2 children per woman.

Maybe the British Medical Journal folks should take their message to Africa or the Middle East where the birth rate is more than double that of Britain. But that wouldn't be politically correct, now would it?
10 posted on 07/24/2008 8:05:24 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

How many articles have we seen about how the indigenous European population is not even replacing itself? And now someone is making this loony proposal. Why tell people to stop at two children when most European nations are already below that?

These busy bodies and totalitarian wannabes just can’t shut up.


11 posted on 07/24/2008 8:09:22 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

WTF happened to Ananova. I’m surprised they are still around and where did the talking chick go?


12 posted on 07/24/2008 8:13:53 PM PDT by mbraynard (You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
And they pointed to research from the Optimum Population Trust which said that each new birth in the UK will be responsible for 160 times more greenhouse gas emissions than a birth in Ethiopia.

So do they think the Ethiopian have a small carbon footprint because they want to be gentle with the environment? The Ethiopians would love to have a bigger carbon footprint and as soon as they can afford to, they increase that footprint.

I have always been amazed that the environmental activist just assume that the people in poor countries love living without any of the modern conveniences that make our everyday lives easier and more pleasant. Do they think the Ethiopians are stupid? That they wouldn't love to have electricity? air conditioning?
13 posted on 07/24/2008 8:15:02 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
That was one of the driving forces of the Watermelons. They were 'zero population growth' folks from the beginning, they were just trying to figure out a way to force it on everyone.

Voila! If they can convince everyone that there is Global Warming, and that it is being cause by humans, they can convince governments that it's in best interest of everyone to limit the numbers of children born into the world.

14 posted on 07/24/2008 8:16:16 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

they must hate that size zero chick from england...


15 posted on 07/24/2008 8:16:46 PM PDT by thefactor (the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
This is what I posted on his blog.

You don't have a problem with religion, you have a problem with Freedom and what people choose to do with it. Individuals are free to exercise religion as they see fit, particularly when it doesn't impose anything on you.

It is true that the Church does engage in public policy issues as an organization of individual citizens collected under the banner of shared belief, petitioning the government for certain laws, etc., which *might* impose on your life somehow.

But rather than engaging in debate or protest against the public policy issues that may affect you, you instead steal property from the Church and desecrate it.

While you could more reasonable object to the Church being involved in a public policy process, you instead target for ridicule and desecration the Eucharist which is stolen and are, in effect, assaulting the individually chosen beliefs of fellow humans for no other reason than to express your own hatred for their self-determination and for free expression.

We could also assume that you are smart enough to know that this is not a way to open people eyes to the mistaken ways of their beliefs. I guess you lacked the sophistry and semi-intellectual capabilities of Dawkins.

But you aren't smart enough to realize that this was a great way for you to get yourself killed by our less tolerant brothers, the Muslim Fundamentalists (see Pim Fortuyn) - but at least we Catholics will pray for you.

18 posted on 07/24/2008 8:27:16 PM PDT by mbraynard (You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

Here’s a better idea. Zero children. Wait a few years and Bingo, no more worrying about global warning, carbon footprints or high gas prices.


19 posted on 07/24/2008 8:32:14 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am
If libs want to be eco friendly they should just kill them selves and stop raping the environment.
20 posted on 07/24/2008 8:53:23 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am

We don’t have any kids but we make up for the loss of human carbon in many other ways!

Not counting company vehicles I’ve burned up over 500,000 gallons of gas, diesel, and aircraft fuel and expect to burn a lot more!

We don’t use funny light bulbs, our computers are on line 24/7 and the thermostats are set for comfort!


22 posted on 07/24/2008 9:23:35 PM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coffee200am; Delacon; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; CygnusXI; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

23 posted on 07/25/2008 3:13:29 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson